://username@domain, you
get a prompt.
and at the same time break thousands of scripts that run with at or cron
when sysadmins start to upgrade wget to that version? oh no... not a good
idea.
--
Henrik van Ginhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Storage for all kinds
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:20:57PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Henrik van Ginhoven wrote: (no I did not ;)
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:49:42AM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Now, something occurs
) and I haven't seen any
FAQ.
I don't think there is one, but perhaps a FAQ-page with the most common (and
not so common) questions that popup on the list from time to time might be a
good idea?
Thanks,
Frederic Lochon
--
Henrik van Ginhoven [EMAIL
);
url[i] = rewritten;
}
else
Regards
--
Henrik van Ginhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Storage for all kinds of waste http://mise.wox.org
... including humans 9799-5
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
But Wget *thinks* that the server doesn't support it. Sending a debug
log of (the relevant part of) the Wget run would probably help in
determining what went wrong.
oops, forgot that (actually, I was afraid I had missed some new
