Re: wget-patches status?

2007-07-06 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the status of the wget-patches list: is it being actively used/monitored? Does it still serve its original purpose? Mauro and I are subscribed to it. The list served its purpose while Wget was actively maintained. It's up to you whether to

Re: wget-patches status?

2007-07-06 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the status of the wget-patches list: is it being actively used/monitored? Does it still serve its original purpose? Mauro and I are subscribed to it. The list served its

Re: wget-patches status?

2007-07-06 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mauro and I are subscribed to it. The list served its purpose while Wget was actively maintained. It's up to you whether to preserve it or replace it with a bug tracker patch submission process. Given the low incidence of patch submission, is there any

wget-patches status?

2007-07-05 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 What is the status of the wget-patches list: is it being actively used/monitored? Does it still serve its original purpose? A brief glance at the archives seems to suggest that, for one reason or another, it may be suffering a larger spam problem