--timestamping and big files?

I think --timestamping fails for files 2Gb wget tries to download the file again with the .1 extension (as if you were not using --timestamping). This only happens to a big file in a list of files I am wgetting.

RE: Is it just that the -m (mirror) option an impossible task [Was: wget 1.91 skips most files]

Maurice Volaski wrote: wget's -m option seems to be able to ignore most of the files it should download from a site. Is this simply because wget can download only the files it can see? That is, if the web server's directory indexing option is off and a page on the site is present on the

Re: --timestamping and big files?

Dan Bolser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think --timestamping fails for files 2Gb Thanks for the report. Wget 1.9.x doesn't support 2+GB files, not only for timestamping. You can try Wget 1.10-beta from ftp://ftp.deepspace6.net/pub/ds6/sources/wget/wget-1.10-beta1.tar.bz2

Re: --timestamping and big files?

On Sat, 28 May 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Dan Bolser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think --timestamping fails for files 2Gb Thanks for the report. Wget 1.9.x doesn't support 2+GB files, not only for timestamping. You can try Wget 1.10-beta from