When deciding whether it should delete a file afterwards, however, it
uses the _local_ filename (relevant code also in recur.c, near "Either
--delete-after was specified,"). I'm not positive, but this probably
means query strings _do_ matter in that case. :p
Confused? Coz I sure am!
Hi.
I couldn't gather much from the wget source code; so want to put up some
questions.
1. Does this necessarily have to be a change in the code of wget? Or
something separate?
2. If it does, could you please tell me the files I should look into, to get
started. I have the general solution in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(I've rearranged your post slightly so that the answers are ordered more
conveniently for me.)
Siddhant Goel wrote:
Hi.
I couldn't gather much from the wget source code; so want to put up some
questions.
1. Does this necessarily have to be a
If we were going to leave this behavior in for some time, then I think
it'd be appropriate to at least mention it (maybe I'll just mention it
anyway, without a comprehensive explanation
It would probably be sufficient to just add a very brief mention
to the docs of 1.11, the two things
Hi all,
I would like to participate in GSOC 2008. I saw some Wget project ideas on
http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas.html. I'm particulary interested
to improve international support and HTTP/1.1 headers support and some
not-too-big
tasks like FTP proxy authentication.
Do you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saint Xavier wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to participate in GSOC 2008. I saw some Wget project ideas on
http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas.html. I'm particulary
interested
to improve international support and HTTP/1.1 headers
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The intent is that all the writer operations would take virtually no
time at all. The sidb_read function should take at most O(N log N) time
on the size of the SIDB file, and should take less than a second under
normal
[...] Is it even useful to _do_ prereleases?
I was waiting for the version which integrated the (previously
suggested) VMS-related changes. (There are some generic FTP-related
fixes hidden among the VMS-related ones, too, of course.)
Perhaps the Summer of Code thing will turn up someone
