Hi,
I'm new to wget. I use the following command
to get files from the site
wget ftp://ftp.iitm.ac.in/debian
and have set my .wgetrc file with the following
tries=20
reclevel=5
passive_ftp = on
http_proxy = http://anselm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9000/
ftp_proxy= http://anselm:[EMAIL
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:54:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2002-01-29 09:56 -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
In particular, does wget parse and follow links in an HTML document,
when that document is retrieved (using -r) via the FTP protocol? If
not, why not?
I'm inclined to think that
Hi,
I have been happily using wget to handle automatic
ftp download but now have a situation which I am
not sure whether wget can handle.
This is the type of synax that I have been using without
any problems:
$ wget ftp://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/file.txt
Now I need to add the twist where
On 29/01/2002 15:54:17 Andre Majorel wrote:
[snip debate about following links in HTML retrieved by FTP]
I'm inclined to think that recursive retrieval without parsing
is a feature. HTML content is normally served over HTTP. If you
want to retrieve HTML through FTP, it's likely because you do
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í
Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÛ³â ÇÑÇØ ÀÏÀÌ Á¦´ë·Î ¾ÊÇ®¸®¼Ì´øºÐ, ´ä´äÇÑ »ç¿¬ÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¼Ì´øºÐ!!
¿ª¼úÀΰú »ó´ãÇغ¸½Ê½Ã¿ä ºÐ¸í ´äÀÌ
ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
ÅäÁ¤ºñ°á, ¼Ó±ÃÇÕ °Ñ±ÃÇÕ, »ç¾÷¿î, ½ÂÁø¿î, ÁøÇпî, °Ç°¿î,
ÀÛ¸í, ÅÃÀÏ, º°ÀÚ¸®Á¡, dz¼öÁö¸®, ¾ÖÁ¤¿î, »ç¶û¿î
½ÅÅëÇÏ°Ô
If you have a spam-fighting suggestion that does *not* include
disallowing non-subscriber postings, I am more than willing to listen.
It's not spam fighting, but I would personally like to see a wget-announce
moderator-only list where new releases and security announcements could be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hrvoje Niksic said:
James C. McMaster (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Reinke said:
Is anyone else not finding the noise ratio (i.e. spam) a bit high
here? I sympathize with the effort required to lightly moderate,
but
On 2002-01-29 22:02 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
But that was just an example. The actual reasoning for allowing
non-subscriber posting boils down to three reasons:
1. I believe it is the right thing to do. I personally hate allegedly
supportive mailing lists that require me to
Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I respectfully disagree. If we can spend the time to read and
answer the poster's question, the poster can spend five minutes
to subscribe/unsubscribe.
For reference, see the netiquette item on posting to newsgroups
and asking for replies by email.
Marc Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you have a spam-fighting suggestion that does *not* include
disallowing non-subscriber postings, I am more than willing to listen.
It's not spam fighting, but I would personally like to see a
wget-announce moderator-only list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hrvoje Niksic said:
Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right now, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is providing free relaying for spammers
to all its subscribers.
So does any mailing list with open subscription.
Any spammer *could* subscribe to an
Brent Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whats CVS and what is the significance of this version?
CVS stands for Concurrent Versions System, and is the version
control system where the master sources for Wget are kept. I would
not advise the download of the CVS version because it is likely to
be
12 matches
Mail list logo
