Re: Portable representation of large integers

2003-09-23 Thread DervishD
Hi Hrvoje :)) * Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: There have been several attempts to fix this: [...] * In its own patches, Debian introduced the use of large file APIs and `long long'. While that's perfectly fine for Debian, it is not portable. Neither the large file API nor

Re: Portable representation of large integers

2003-09-23 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, you're true, but... How about using C99 large integer types (intmax_t and family)? But then I can use `long long' just as well, which is supported by C99 and (I think) required to be at least 64 bits wide. Portability is the whole problem, so

Getting wget to use .listing but not update missing local files

2003-09-23 Thread Kjell Grindalen
Hello I am using wget to download only new/modified files from an website where I cant delete files. I am using wget like this: Wget -m -nv -nH -P /local/file/dir -a /var/adm/messages ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Everything works great, except that I need to process the files I am getting

Re: Portable representation of large integers

2003-09-23 Thread DervishD
Hi Hrvoje :) * Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Using #ifdefs to switch between %d/%lld/%j *is* completely portable, but it requires three translations for each message. The translators would feast on my flesh, howling at the moonlight. Sure ;)) Anyway, it will happen in just

Re: Portable representation of large integers

2003-09-23 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: I doubt any system that does not support off_t does support LFS. As I mentioned in the first message, LFS is not the only thing you need large values for. Think download quota or the sum of downloaded bytes. You should be able to specify

bug maybe?

2003-09-23 Thread Randy Paries
Not sure if this is a bug or not. i can not get a file over 2GB (i get a MAX file Exceeded error message) this is on a redhat 9 box. GNU Wget 1.8.2, Thanks Randy

Re: bug maybe?

2003-09-23 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Randy Paries [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not sure if this is a bug or not. I guess it could be called a bug, although it's no simple oversight. Wget currently doesn't support large files.

RE: bug maybe?

2003-09-23 Thread Matt Pease
how do I get off this list? I tried a few times before got no response from the server. thank you- Matt -Original Message- From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:53 PM To: Randy Paries Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bug maybe?

Wget 1.9-beta1 is available for testing

2003-09-23 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
After a lot of time of sitting in CVS, a beta of Wget 1.9 is available. To see what's new since 1.8, check the `NEWS' file in the distribution. Get it from: http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~hniksic/wget/wget-1.9-beta1.tar.gz Please test it on as many different platforms as possible and in the places

unsubscribe me now otherwise messages will bounce back to you

2003-09-23 Thread lu001