Re: [Patch] LC_CTYPE not defined

2001-03-30 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Philipp Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * R.I.P. Deaddog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010329 23:12]: I have checked out the cvs version (both 1.6.1-dev and 1.7-dev), and found no related modification... and nothing mentioned in Changelog. Is it that I missed something? Well, then it

Re: [Patch] LC_CTYPE not defined

2001-03-30 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Backported Philipp's patch to 1.6.1-dev and is attached here. This patch can be used again 1.6 too. Not sure if this is a useless patch? :) Abel Cheung On 30 Mar 2001, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Philipp Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * R.I.P. Deaddog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010329 23:12]:

Re: [Patch] LC_CTYPE not defined

2001-03-28 Thread Philipp Thomas
* R.I.P. Deaddog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010328 12:16]: I'm not sure if this has been reported before, but the patch is attached here just in case. I did report it. But setting LC_CTYPE is not enough, as this will change the behaviour of the ctype.h macros. Check out the CVS version, as I

Re: [Patch] LC_CTYPE not defined

2001-03-28 Thread Dan Harkless
"R.I.P. Deaddog" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh yes, two questions remains.. 1) Sorry for my ignorance, what is the CVSROOT for wget? See http://sunsite.dk/wget/ (or more spefically, http://sunsite.dk/wget/wgetdev.html). 2) I have updated zh_TW.Big5 translation of wget (yes, it is "zh"