Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-18 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 04:57 pm, Ulf Harnhammar wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:53:40PM -0500, Mauro Tortonesi wrote: the web pages (including the documentation) on gnu.org have just been updated. Nice! I have found some broken links and strange grammar, though: * index.html: There

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-18 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 05:14 pm, Ulf Harnhammar wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:57:42PM +0200, Ulf Harnhammar wrote: * faq.html ** 3.1 [..] Yes, starting from version 1.10, GNU Wget support files larger than 2GB. (should be supports) ** 2.0 How I compile GNU Wget? (should be How

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-15 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this seems to be already fixed in the 1.10 documentation. Now that 1.10 is released, we should probably update the on-site documentation.

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-15 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 02:05 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this seems to be already fixed in the 1.10 documentation. Now that 1.10 is released, we should probably update the on-site documentation. i am doing it right now. -- Aequam memento rebus in

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-15 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 02:16 pm, Mauro Tortonesi wrote: On Wednesday 15 June 2005 02:05 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this seems to be already fixed in the 1.10 documentation. Now that 1.10 is released, we should probably update the on-site

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-15 Thread Ulf Harnhammar
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:53:40PM -0500, Mauro Tortonesi wrote: the web pages (including the documentation) on gnu.org have just been updated. Nice! I have found some broken links and strange grammar, though: * index.html: There are archives of the main GNU Wget list at ** fly.cc.fer.hr **

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-15 Thread Ulf Harnhammar
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:57:42PM +0200, Ulf Harnhammar wrote: * faq.html ** 3.1 [..] Yes, starting from version 1.10, GNU Wget support files larger than 2GB. (should be supports) ** 2.0 How I compile GNU Wget? (should be How do I) // Ulf

Re: Small bug in Wget manual page

2005-06-07 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Thursday 02 June 2005 09:33 am, Herb Schilling wrote: Hi, On http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/wget.html, the section on protocol-directories has a paragraph that is a duplicate of the section on no-host-directories. Other than that, the manual is terrific! Wget is wonderful also.

wget for win32; small bug

2003-06-21 Thread Mark
although this is a windows bug, it effects this program. when leeching files with the name prn com1 eg. prn.html wget will freeze up becuse windows will not allow it to save a file with that name. A possable soultion, saving the file as prn_.html just a suggestion. -pionig

A small bug in wget

2003-02-28 Thread HÃ¥var Valeur
The bug appers if you use another output file and try to convert the url's at the same time. If you try to execute the following: wget -k -O myFile http://www.stud.ntnu.no/index.html The file will not convert, becuse wget do not locate the file index.html since the output-file is not index.html

Re: small bug in wget manpage: --progress

2002-04-15 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the wget 1.8.1 manpage tells me: --progress=type Select the type of the progress indicator you wish to use. Legal indicators are ``dot'' and ``bar''. The ``dot'' indicator is used by default. It traces

Re: A small bug

2001-12-14 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Peng GUAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe a bug in file fnmatch.c, line 54: ( n==string || (flags FNM_PATHNAME) n[-1] == '/')) the n[-1] should be change to *(n-1). In C n[-1] is exactly the same as *(n-1).

Re: A small bug

2001-12-14 Thread Ian Abbott
On 14 Dec 2001 at 14:49, Peng GUAN wrote: Maybe a bug in file fnmatch.c, line 54: ( n==string || (flags FNM_PATHNAME) n[-1] == '/')) the n[-1] should be change to *(n-1). I like the easy ones. Those are equivalent in C. As to which of the too looks the nicest is a matter of aesthetics

A small bug

2001-12-13 Thread Peng GUAN
Dear, Maybe a bug in file fnmatch.c, line 54: ( n==string || (flags FNM_PATHNAME) n[-1] == '/')) the n[-1] should be change to *(n-1). Regards