Dave Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ps anyone getting a bunch of what look like viruses on the
wget-patches list?
I just noticed them on gmane. I've now asked the SunSITE.dk staff to
deploy the kind of virus/spam protection currently used by this list
(confirmation required for non-subscribers
Leonid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven and Hrvoje,
wget-1.9.1 has a function number_to_string which is in fact a
home-made equivalent to printf () %ld.
Yes, but that function is merely an optimization used to avoid
frequent calls to sprintf(buf, %ld, num). Wget does in fact in many
places
Hrvoje,
Is your LFS patch available on the web? I was unsubscribed from
wget-patches due to bounces from my address and there is no web
archive (that I know of) of that list.
Yes. It is in http://software.lpetrov.net/wget-LFS/
Another bonus of using routines number_to_string and
It's not my program (obviously), but:
1. I'd say that code like if ( sizeof(number) == 8 ) should have
been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
2. Multiple functions like print_number_as_string() and
print_second_number_as_string() (and so on?) look like a real pain
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other function arguments control various formatting options. (Where
can't GCC printf() using %ll?)
For the record, GCC doesn't printf() anything, printf is defined in
the standard library. If the operating system's printf() doesn't
support %ll,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
The other function arguments control various formatting options. (Where
can't GCC printf() using %ll?)
For the record, GCC doesn't printf() anything, printf is defined in
the standard library. If the operating system's printf() doesn't
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but perhaps a better question would have been, 'Where can't a GCC
user do a printf() using %ll?'.
On any system that predates `long long'. For example, SunOS 4.1.x,
Ultrix, etc.
I thought we were discussing changes for large-file support.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:52:56 -0600 (CST), Steven M. Schweda wrote:
I don't claim that it's a perfect scheme, but it would probably pay
to look at the beta code for Zip 3.0 and/or UnZip 6.0 to see how these
things are done in a _very_ portable program. (Before doing something
even more lame.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but perhaps a better question would have been, 'Where can't a GCC
user do a printf() using %ll?'.
On any system that predates `long long'. For example, SunOS 4.1.x,
Ultrix, etc.
I thought we were
Is the source for Zip 3.0/UnZip 6.0 publicaly available?
I believe that some relatively recent beta code (Zip 3.0d, UnZip
6.0b) is available under:
ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/OLD/beta/
and probably various mirrors around the world. You might wish to start
at
Steven and Hrvoje,
wget-1.9.1 has a function number_to_string which is in fact
a home-made equivalent to printf () %ld. In the LFS patch which
I submitted I made a sister-routine number_to_string_64 which
is equivalent to printf() %llu. Thus, wget does not rely on
%ll or %llu.
Leonid
16-FEB-2005
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
For the last several months I've been completely absent from Wget
development, and from the net in general. Here is why, and the story
is not for the faint of heart.
Glad you're back and hope your health is getting better.
The TODO list has grown a bit while you've been
For the last several months I've been completely absent from Wget
development, and from the net in general. Here is why, and the story
is not for the faint of heart.
Near the end of July I took a two-week vacation. On August 2nd I
found it took an effort to stand up from a sitting position.
13 matches
Mail list logo
