would be nice to have the NTLM support with proxies too
just trying to vote for this feature request ;-)
thanx
Merten
-Original Message-
From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:11 PM
To: wget@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Basic auth by default
Daniel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
It's easy to bring back the code itself, but it's not easy to integrate it
with how Wget communicates with proxies, at least not without reworking a
large chunk of HTTP code. That is why I started with support for simple
client NTLM and postponed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:33:35 -0700 Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Wget should not be attempting basic authentication before it
receives a challenge (which could be digest or what have you). This
is a security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Micah Cowan wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:33:35 -0700 Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i am not so sure this is a critical point. as hrvoje pointed out,
basic authentication is definitely the most used
Micah Cowan wrote:
However, performance at the cost of security is not a trade-off
I am willing to make. Regardless of whether digest is widely
used or not, any security-minded user who happens to discover
the way we do things will be very upset with us, and justifiably
so. This situation is
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Barnett, Rodney wrote:
I agree. I discovered this when trying to use wget with an HTTP
proxy that uses NTLM. (Is that on the list somewhere?)
I'm pretty sure the original NTLM code I contributed to wget _had_ the ability
to deal with proxies (as I wrote the support for
