Dan Harkless wrote:
Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What was their response?
Nothing.
Perhaps you'd get one if you made a more official bug report.
Perhaps. But one of the best ways to piss off users is to claim "not a bug"
for something that is a pretty obvious bug, or, even
Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Libtool is not the be-all end-all answer to our linking problems,
even if we wish it were. Maybe these things are easier to achieve
with libtool than without it, but it doesn't come without a cost.
Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But keep in mind that it's not a catch-all solution and don't
promote it as such.
I don't believe anyone's been doing that.
I'm sorry. I must have misinterpreted your "I'm now totally convinced."
Yes you did. I wasn't saying "I'm now totally
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan Prikryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yup. It's not the default for OpenSSL, though. It installs in
/usr/local/ssl/lib by default. As `configure --help' tells you:
Well, as a "normal" user I would expect the configure script will be
able
