Re: Is wget --timestamping URL working on Windows 2000?

2001-12-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 11 Dec 2001 at 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that if an output_document is specified, it is being clobbered at the very beginning (unless always_rest is true). Later in http_loop stat() comes up with zero length. Hence there's always a size mismatch when --output-document

Re: Is wget --timestamping URL working on Windows 2000?

2001-12-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it's as documented in the man page. The option is meant for concatenating several pages into one big file, and you can't meaningfully compare timestamps or file sizes in that case. Ah, so this behaviour is by design. Even so, the behaviour is slightly

Re: Is wget --timestamping URL working on Windows 2000?

2001-12-12 Thread Adrian Aichner
Hrvoje == Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it's as documented in the man page. The option is meant for concatenating several pages into one big file, and you can't meaningfully compare timestamps or file sizes in that case.

Re: Is wget --timestamping URL working on Windows 2000?

2001-12-11 Thread csaba . raduly
On 11/12/2001 14:03:54 Adrian Aichner wrote: Hi Wgeteers! Is -N, --timestamping don't retrieve files if older than local. supposed to work on windows 2000? [snip] cd c:\Hacking\SunSITE.dk\xemacsweb\Download\win32\ %TEMP%\wget.wip\src\wget.exe --debug --timestamping