RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-24 Thread Tony Lewis
Coombe, Allan David (DPS) wrote: However, the case of the files on disk is still mixed - so I assume that wget is not using the URL it originally requested (harvested from the HTML?) to create directories and files on disk. So what is it using? A http header (if so, which one??). I think

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-24 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: Coombe, Allan David (DPS) wrote: However, the case of the files on disk is still mixed - so I assume that wget is not using the URL it originally requested (harvested from the HTML?) to create directories and files on disk. So

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-24 Thread Coombe, Allan David (DPS)
. When I reported that it wasn't working I hadn't done both at the same time. Cheers Allan -Original Message- From: Micah Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2008 6:44 AM To: Tony Lewis Cc: Coombe, Allan David (DPS); 'Wget' Subject: Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-22 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Coombe, Allan David (DPS) wrote: OK - now I am confused. I found a perl based http proxy (named http::proxy funnily enough) that has filters to change both the request and response headers and data. I modified the response from the web site to

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-21 Thread Coombe, Allan David (DPS)
OK - now I am confused. I found a perl based http proxy (named http::proxy funnily enough) that has filters to change both the request and response headers and data. I modified the response from the web site to lowercase the urls in the html (actually I lowercased the whole response) and the

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-19 Thread Coombe, Allan David (DPS)
-Original Message- From: Micah Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 7:30 AM To: Tony Lewis Cc: Coombe, Allan David (DPS); 'Wget' Subject: Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: Micah Cowan

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-19 Thread mm w
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 7:30 AM To: Tony Lewis Cc: Coombe, Allan David (DPS); 'Wget' Subject: Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: Micah Cowan wrote: Unfortunately, nothing really comes to mind

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-19 Thread mm w
) when I did the first process. Cheers Allan -Original Message- From: Micah Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 14 June 2008 7:30 AM To: Tony Lewis Cc: Coombe, Allan David (DPS); 'Wget' Subject: Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-19 Thread Tony Lewis
mm w wrote: a simple url-rewriting conf should fix the problem, wihout touch the file system everything can be done server side Why do you assume the user of wget has any control over the server from which content is being downloaded?

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-19 Thread mm w
not al, but in this particular case I pretty sure they have On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mm w wrote: a simple url-rewriting conf should fix the problem, wihout touch the file system everything can be done server side Why do you assume the user of

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-16 Thread mm w
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mm w wrote: Hi, after all, after all it's only my point of view :D anyway, /dir/file, dir/File, non-standard Dir/file, non-standard and /Dir/File non-standard According to RFC 2396: The path component contains data,

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-14 Thread Tony Lewis
mm w wrote: Hi, after all, after all it's only my point of view :D anyway, /dir/file, dir/File, non-standard Dir/file, non-standard and /Dir/File non-standard According to RFC 2396: The path component contains data, specific to the authority (or the scheme if there is no authority

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread Tony Lewis
Micah Cowan wrote: Unfortunately, nothing really comes to mind. If you'd like, you could file a feature request at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additemgroup=wget, for an option asking Wget to treat URLs case-insensitively. To have the effect that Allan seeks, I think the option would

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread mm w
standard: the URL are case-insensitive you can adapt your software because some people don't respect standard, we are not anymore in 90's, let people doing crapy things deal with their crapy world Cheers! On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Micah Cowan wrote:

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: Micah Cowan wrote: Unfortunately, nothing really comes to mind. If you'd like, you could file a feature request at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additemgroup=wget, for an option asking Wget to treat URLs

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread Steven M. Schweda
In the VMS world, where file name case may matter, but usually doesn't, the normal scheme is to preserve case when creating files, but to do case-insensitive comparisons on file names. From Tony Lewis: To have the effect that Allan seeks, I think the option would have to convert all URIs to

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread Tony Lewis
mm w wrote: standard: the URL are case-insensitive you can adapt your software because some people don't respect standard, we are not anymore in 90's, let people doing crapy things deal with their crapy world You obviously missed the point of the original posting: how can one conveniently

RE: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread Tony Lewis
Steven M. Schweda wrote: From Tony Lewis: To have the effect that Allan seeks, I think the option would have to convert all URIs to lower case at an appropriate point in the process. I think that that's the wrong way to look at it. Implementation details like name hashing may also need

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-13 Thread mm w
Hi, after all, after all it's only my point of view :D anyway, /dir/file, dir/File, non-standard Dir/file, non-standard and /Dir/File non-standard that's it, if the server manages non-standard URL, it's not my concern, for me it doesn't exist On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Tony Lewis [EMAIL

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-12 Thread Matthias Vill
Hi list! saddly I couldn't find the E-Mail of Allan (maybe because I'm atached by the news gateway) so this is a list-only-post. Micah Cowan wrote: Hi Allan, You'll generally get better results if you post to the mailing list (wget@sunsite.dk). I've added it to the recipients list. Coombe,

Re: Wget 1.11.3 - case sensetivity and URLs

2008-06-11 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allan, You'll generally get better results if you post to the mailing list (wget@sunsite.dk). I've added it to the recipients list. Coombe, Allan David (DPS) wrote: Hi Micah, First some context… We are using wget 1.11.3 to mirror a web site