Re: [whatwg] Anchor target-attribute extension to enable dom targeting

2007-04-09 Thread Gervase Markham
Kornel Lesinski wrote: I was just referring to the concept. Something similar could be made for HTML. It has been, albeit requiring script at the moment: http://disruptive-innovations.com/zoo/20040830/HTMLoverlays.html Gerv

Re: [whatwg] Give guidance about RFC 4281 codecs parameter

2007-04-09 Thread Dave Singer
WARNING: I have CC'd the co-authors of the RFC, as I think they might like to see the discussion, comment on my answers, and possibly correct me. I also have a question whether there is a typo in the RFC... * * * * * Henry these are all great questions. Let me see how many I can answer.

Re: [whatwg] Attribute for holding private data for scripting

2007-04-09 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 8, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: At http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/04/html_5.html PPK suggests having an attribute for storing private data for scripts. Currently, one can invent an attribute and it will work for scripts. However, it will look ugly for

Re: [whatwg] Attribute for holding private data for scripting

2007-04-09 Thread ddailey
Henri, thanks for the link to PPK's suggestions -- I rather like many of them. Henri Sivonen wrote: At http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/04/html_5.html PPK suggests having an attribute for storing private data for scripts. I'm having a hard time seeing what you're talking about

Re: [whatwg] Give guidance about RFC 4281 codecs parameter

2007-04-09 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On 4/9/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WARNING: I have CC'd the co-authors of the RFC, as I think they might like to see the discussion, comment on my answers, and possibly correct me. I also have a question whether there is a typo in the RFC... * * * * * Henry these are

Re: [whatwg] Give guidance about RFC 4281 codecs parameter

2007-04-09 Thread Dave Singer
At 11:59 -0700 9/04/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello, On 4/9/07, Dave Singer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WARNING: I have CC'd the co-authors of the RFC, as I think they might like to see the discussion, comment on my answers, and possibly correct me. I also

Re: [whatwg] Attribute for holding private data for scripting

2007-04-09 Thread Jon Barnett
I can think of two possibilities. One would be to allow the param element as a child of any element (or any block level element?) http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#param And then make an attribute of HTMLElement called params readonly attribute HTMLCollection params; Where

Re: [whatwg] Thesis draft about HTML5 conformance checking

2007-04-09 Thread olivier Thereaux
On Mar 28, 2007, at 21:24 , Henri Sivonen wrote: It's been a truly informative and enlightening reading, especially the parts where you develop on the (im)possibility of using only schemas to describe conformance to the html5 specs. This is a question that has been bothering me for a long