Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

2007-06-15 Thread Simon Pieters
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:05:05 +0200, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, �istein E. Andersen wrote: From section 9.2.3.1. Tokenising entities: For some entities, UAs require a semicolon, for others they don't. This applies to IE. FWIW, the entities not requiring a

Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

2007-06-15 Thread Křištof Želechovski
Aside: I know that it can be changed but iuml is a very unfortunate name for i tréma. How about deprecating iuml in favor of itrema? Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Pieters Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 8:49 AM To: Ian Hickson;

[whatwg] file URL is overspecified

2007-06-15 Thread Kristof Zelechovski
The URI reference http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/references.html in the HTML 4 refers to RFC 2396 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt which is obsolete by RFC 3986 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt . The latter document has a new section 2.5: Identifying Data, containing the following new

Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

2007-06-15 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:05:05 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like naiumlve actually conforming. I don't know if we want this. Rather not. This would break

Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

2007-06-15 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:45 +0200, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:05:05 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like naiumlve actually

Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

2007-06-15 Thread MegaZone
Once upon a time Ian Hickson shaped the electrons to say... I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like naiumlve actually conforming. I don't know if we want this. On the one hand, it's pragmatic (after all, why

[whatwg] Canvas ImageData comments

2007-06-15 Thread Philip Taylor
Some minor comments from looking again at the ImageData section: Colour spaces are not dealt with at all, but are particularly relevant for getImageData (else you have no idea what the values mean). It's probably easiest if no conversions happen at all in the canvas, so you could have: