Reporting the absolute time of the current sample won't help when
the first sample of the file doesn't have a timestamp of zero. It will
be even more confusing for files with portions removed or added
without fixing time stamps - for example a movie created by
concatenating different
I'm trying to devise some guidance about how to mark up interviews in
HTML 4.01, but am running across some practical issues that are relevant
to HTML5's DIALOG element.
Here's some real-world content:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm/story/0,,1349947,00.html
Note that some of the dicta
On Nov 23, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Maik Merten wrote:
Eric Carlson schrieb:
Reporting the absolute time of the current sample won't help when
the
first sample of the file doesn't have a timestamp of zero. It will be
even more confusing for files with portions removed or added without
fixing
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Eric Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Maik Merten wrote:
Eric Carlson schrieb:
Reporting the absolute time of the current sample won't help when the
first sample of the file doesn't have a timestamp of zero. It will be
even
On 23 Nov 2008, at 20:11, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
I'm wondering whether:
dtJack White/dt
ddfoobarpbaz/ppquux/p/dd
is equivalent to or different to:
dtJack White/dt
ddpfoobar/ppbaz/ppquux/p/dd
Semantically equivalent, though different in the trees they produce
(in the former foobar
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Garrett Smith wrote:
There is no note in the WF 2.0 specification, nor the HTML 4.01, nor the
HTML DOM specifications that an element should not be named submit or
action to avoid such consequences.
Eric Carlson schrieb:
QuickTime has used this method this since it started supporting VBR
mp3 in 2000, and in practice it works quite well. I am sure that there
are degenerate cases where the initial estimate is way off, but
generally it is accurate enough that it isn't a problem. An initial
