Manu Sporny mspo...@digitalbazaar.com, 2009-01-18 19:18 -0500:
Speaking as an RDFa Task Force member - we're currently looking at an
alternative prefix binding mechanism, so that this:
xmlns:foaf=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/;
could also be declared like this in non-XML family languages:
Michael(tm) Smith m...@w3.org, 2009-01-19 17:40 +0900:
Manu Sporny mspo...@digitalbazaar.com, 2009-01-18 19:18 -0500:
prefix=foaf=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/;
URL for an archived mailing-list discussion about it?
OK, I found this:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 02:18, Manu Sporny wrote:
Toby A Inkster wrote:
So RDFa, as it is currently defined, does need a CURIE binding
mechanism. XML namespaces are used for XHTML+RDFa 1.0, but given that
namespaces don't work in HTML, an alternative mechanism for defining
them is expected, and
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Michael(tm) Smith m...@w3.org, 2009-01-19 17:40 +0900:
Manu Sporny mspo...@digitalbazaar.com, 2009-01-18 19:18 -0500:
prefix=foaf=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/;
URL for an archived mailing-list discussion about it?
OK, I found this:
If this was discussed already, sorry. There has been so much RDF/meta
data discussion that I'm far from on top of it..
I'd like some way to add meta data to a page that could be integrated
with the UA's copy/paste commands.
For example, if I copy a sentence from Wikipedia and paste it in some
Hallvord R M Steen wrote:
I'd like some way to add meta data to a page that could be integrated
with the UA's copy/paste commands.
These use cases are a good start, but the problem is that you've begun
with the assumption that copy and paste would be a part of the solution.
For example, if
Spell checking of regions of text should be governed by the lang attribute,
if any, and browser preferences; it would be switched off for language tags
the spell-checking engine does not support, including custom ones.
It is extremely annoying how Safari, although (supposedly) localized to
Polish,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The same engineers have since implemented this feature in Chrome also,
Incorrect. One engineer implemented a crude hack in a small portion of the
Chromium glue code that implements a fraction of the spec -- enough to make
Gmail
I have a test case that works in major browsers (FF, Opera, Safari, IE6) but
that I don't think would work if the they followed the behavior as currently
specified in HTML5. I've put the test case online:
http://stakface.com/pub/mango/ext7.html
The assertion
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Actually I was just poking around and noticed that we don't actually
support variation of spellcheck values within different parts of an editable
element. So I won't make any claims about how hard that is to support.
2009/1/20 Jamie Rumbelow ja...@jamierumbelow.net:
I think that the already available solution to your problem are Microformats
- you are essentially embedding metadata, semantically in HTML.
Of course, but I think your comment misses half of the proposed
solution.. namely what format the UA
Just a couple of clarifications - not trying to convince anybody of
anything, just setting the record straight.
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Even though switching over to 'prefix' in both HTML and XHTML would
address the DOM Consistency concern, using them for RDF-like URI mapping
would as opposed to
I'd like some way to add meta data to a page that could be integrated
with the UA's copy/paste commands.
These use cases are a good start, but the problem is that you've begun with
the assumption that copy and paste would be a part of the solution.
That's not a bug, it's a feature :)
Ian
On Jan 18, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:
Take you guys seriously...OK, yeah.
I don't doubt that the work will be challenging, or problematical.
I'm not denying Henri's claim. And I didn't claim to be the one who
would necessarily come up with the solutions, either, but that I
14 matches
Mail list logo
