On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:57:15 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote:
I don't think the spec is clear enough defining these two elements from
an author's perspective.
..
What is the difference between a figure that has no caption and an
aside? Both
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:33:56 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Samuel Santos wrote:
I was asked by a client if it was possible to implement something
similar to the asynchronous file upload used on gmail using only
standard web technologies.
Looking at the gmail
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:32:34 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Page 3:
h2My Catsh2
dl
dtSchrouml;dinger
dd item=com.damowmow.cat
meta property=com.damowmow.name content=Schrouml;dinger
meta
Some of the improvement suggestions that I have heard that sounds
interesting, though possibly for the next version of microdata.
* Support for specifying a machine-readable value, such as for dates,
colors, numbers, etc.
I expect we will add support for these based on demand, the same way
* Let a COLOR element have a value DOM property in the DOM that returns a
color.
* Let a NUMBER element has a value DOM property that returns a number.
Actually, the latter use case is one I have bumped into:
* The DOM does not provide a numeric value,
* JavaScript support for parsing localized
The problem of W3C DTD DDoS does not apply to CURIE because software
processing RDF does not need to retrieve the resources referenced on a
regular basis. Even in the case of DTD, the problem is that some software
does not cache, not that some software tries to access it.
IMHO,
Chris
Please don't cross-post to w3 lists and to whatwg lists.
2009/6/8 Asser Nilsson asser.nils...@googlemail.com:
Hi!
There are two things in HTML5-forms that are often made with Active
Technology like JavaScript, that would be very cool, if HTML5 could do
these things without Scripting:
1.
Ian Hickson wrote:
I agree entirely. I actually tried to find a workable solution to address
this but unfortunately the only general solutions I could come up with
that would allow this were selector-based, and in practice authors are
still having trouble understanding how to use Selectors
This is a proposal that I posted to w3.org a year ago, and it didn't really get
any debate there so I'm hoping to provoke some here, i wont go into too much
detail instead linking to the original posts but i'll give a bit of an overview
here...
Essentially the proposal is for a static DOM
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Jacob Rask wrote:
has there ever been any discussion on including an attribute to the code
element, specify the programming language in the markup? If so, what was
the conclusion? I didn't find anything in
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:33:56 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Samuel Santos wrote:
I was asked by a client if it was possible to implement something
similar to the asynchronous file
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:37:04 +0200, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote:
Does the planned API allow for the composition of multipart encoded posts
including binary file parts? So not just sending the binary file data in
isolation.
Such that the caller can use some File API to obtain
Le 3 juin 09 à 23h19, Ian Hickson écrivit :
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
HTML5 currently contains a table of encodings aliases,
[...]
GB2312 and GB_2312-80 technically refer to the *character set* GB
2312-80,
[...]. GBK, on the other hand, is an encoding.
[...]
There is
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
Section 2.9.3 DOMTokenList says:
The DOMTokenList interface represents an interface to an underlying
string that consists of an *unordered* set of unique space-separated
tokens.
Yet, the item method says:
The item(index) method must split
Ensuring consistency between browsers, to reduce the likelihood that any
particular browser's ordering becomes important and then forcing that
browser's ordering (which could be some arbitrary ordering dependent on
some particular hash function, say) into the platform de facto.
This is similar
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Eduard Pascual wrote:
I have put online a document that describes my idea/proposal for a
selector-based solution to metadata. The document can be found at
http://herenvardo.googlepages.com/CRDF.pdf Feel free to copy and/or link
the file wherever you deem appropriate.
I was about to follow up on this. Requiring
sorting which is O(n log n) for something that can be done in O(n)
makes thing slower
without any real benefit.
Like João said the order should be defined as the order of the class content
attribute.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 16:00, João Eiras
Hi WHATWG!
In Chromium, workers are going to have their separate processes, at least
for now. So we quickly found that while(true) foo = new Worker(...)
quickly consumes the OS resources :-) In fact, this will kill other browsers
too, and on some systems the unbounded number of threads will
I believe that this will be difficult to have such a limit as sites
may rely on GC to collect Workers that are no longer running (so
number of running threads is non-deterministic), and in the context of
mix source content (mash-ups) it will be difficult for any content
source to be sure
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Dmitry Titovdim...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi WHATWG!
In Chromium, workers are going to have their separate processes, at least
for now. So we quickly found that while(true) foo = new Worker(...)
quickly consumes the OS resources :-) In fact, this will kill other
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
I believe that this will be difficult to have such a limit as sites may
rely on GC to collect Workers that are no longer running (so number of
running threads is
non-deterministic), and in the context of mix source content
This is a bit of an aside, but section 4.5 of the Web Workers spec no longer
makes any guarantees regarding GC of workers. I would expect user agents to
make some kind of best effort to detect unreachability in the simplest
cases, but supporting MessagePorts and SharedWorkers makes authoritatively
It occurs to me that my statement was a bit stronger than I intended - the
spec *does* indeed make guarantees regarding GC of workers, but they are
fairly loose and typically tied to the parent Document becoming inactive.
-atw
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
This is the solution that Firefox 3.5 uses. We use a pool of
relatively few OS threads (5 or so iirc). This pool is then scheduled
to run worker tasks as they are scheduled. So for example if you
create 1000 worker objects, those 5 threads will take turns to execute
the initial scripts one
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Brett Zamir wrote:
While this may be too far in the game to bring up, I'd very much be
interested (and think others would be too) to have a standard means of
representing not only individual files, but also groups of files on the
web.
This seems reasonable, but I
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Brett Zamir wrote:
Has any thought been given to standardizing on at least a part of DOM
Level 3 Load and Save in HTML5?
DOM3 Load and Save is already standardised as far as I can tell. I don't
see why HTML5 would have to say anything about it.
--
Ian Hickson
For some reason tonight I decided to check on what up coming in the new HTML5
and have some questions, queries and concerns. I hope I'm not too being
redundent with other comments:
1) I've usedframes in many web pages, and I see this is being dropped. I
typically have a selection frame and a
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote:
This is the solution that Firefox 3.5 uses. We use a pool of
relatively few OS threads (5 or so iirc). This pool is then scheduled
to run worker tasks as they are scheduled. So for example if you
create 1000 worker
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
As I have mentioned earlier, there are some devices that will be unable
to render video faithfully inline, due to the limitations of hardware
video accelerators. However, it occurs to me that there are two
essentially different uses for
29 matches
Mail list logo
