On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote:
Control characters are allowed (though using them would be silly).
Why are control characters (except LF and CR) allowed?
There doesn't seem to be a good reason to exclude them, and excluding
them would lead to a
Ian Hickson wrote:
...
And, why is it limited to ASCII instead of UTF-8?
Because the HTTP working group refuse to allow UTF-8 in HTTP headers for
reasons that I don't really understand, and the handshake is supposed to
be valid HTTP.
...
A change of the default encoding would be
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
Control characters are allowed (though using them would be silly).
Why are control characters (except LF and CR) allowed?
There doesn't seem to be a
It's not clear from the Web Workers spec which interface objects and
constructors should be available to the non-worker context. Worker and
SharedWorker obviously should be available, but what about AbstractWorker
and the others? I think Worker, SharedWorker and ErrorEvent should
probably
The Navigator and WorkerLocation interfaces in workers have inconsistent
naming. Please rename the Navigator interface to WorkerNavigator.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Hi,
In a recent investigation into capacity issues, I found that there are
several instances where the browser will make a second to the page based
on resolving empty-string URLs in the several tags. I tested four
instances: img src=, link href=, script src=, and iframe
src=. Across major
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Presently, HTML5 does provide guidance on the correct behavior for img
src=”” in section 4.8.2, indicating that Firefox 3.5’s and Opera 10’s
behavior in this regard is correct:
“If the base URI of the element is the
Thanks for the references, this helps my understanding a lot.
The reason I think this is important is because the just fetch the
resource again behavior is inherently destructive and unexpected. When
one of these appears on a page, page views double. This isn't a problem
if it's your personal
David Bruant :
In the delegation example, the number of workers chosen is an arbitrary
10. But, in a single-core processor, having only one worker will result
in more or less the same running time, because at the end, each worker
runs on the only core.
Ian Hickson :
That depends on the
Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, David Bruant wrote:
This is a new proposal taking into account the feedback I recieved to
the [WebWorkers] About the delegation example message.
In the delegation example of the WebWorker spec, we can see this line :
var num_workers = 10;
My
We discussed this previously (
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-July/020865.html) -
the consensus was that since the Worker APIs are inherently asynchronous,
user agents were free to impose limits on worker creation (and queue up new
creation requests when the limit has
Excuse me if this has already been discussed
Has there been a proposal for allowing mouse events to go through a canvas
element where it is transparent to the element below?
As an example, assume you have a canvas element with a triangle rendered
into the top left corner so that half the canvas
The reason WebWorkers don't have access to the DOM is concurrency. For
example, to loop through a list of children I need to first read the
number of childrens, then have a for loop which starts at 0 and ends
at length-1. If you have two threads that can access the DOM
concurrently, then one
On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Gregg Tavares wrote:
Excuse me if this has already been discussed
Has there been a proposal for allowing mouse events to go through a canvas
element where it is transparent to the element below?
As an example, assume you have a canvas element with a triangle
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (�µ~\飼æ~V~Gæ~U~O) wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
Control characters are
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi,
In a recent investigation into capacity issues, I found that there are
several instances where the browser will make a second to the page based on
resolving empty-string URLs in the several tags. I tested four
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Jason Oster paras...@kodewerx.org wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Gregg Tavares wrote:
Excuse me if this has already been discussed
Has there been a proposal for allowing mouse events to go through a canvas
element where it is transparent to the element
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
(e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); )
It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how
can we distinguish U+0020 and U+0020
18 matches
Mail list logo
