On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
(e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); )
It seems space is optional after colon in field
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
(e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); )
It seems space is optional after colon in field of
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (�~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
(e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); )
It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how
can we distinguish U+0020
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
(e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); )
It
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:52:41 +0100, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know why img src= has a special exception. It would be
possible to look through the svn log to see if there was a helpful
commit message, or maybe someone will remember.
I seem to remember someone from
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Indeed. We've talked about using this CSS property as a way to let
only the non-transparent parts of an image receive events.
Unfortunately if I recall correctly none of the currently defined
values of pointer-events fit
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:52:41 +0100, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't know why img src= has a special exception. It would be
possible to look through the svn log to see if there was a helpful
commit
I'd agree with that, I've yet been able to find an example of someone
intentionally including an empty-string URL in one of these tags.
-Nicholas
__
Commander Lock: Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe!
Morpheus: My beliefs do not
The change seems reasonable to me. It just seems that the same change
should be made in all cases that cause similar issues, making it the
rule of the spec instead of an exception for this one case. Does that
make sense?
-Nicholas
__
Commander Lock:
Hello,
I propose changing this text:
This flag also prevents script from reading the document.cookie IDL
attribute.
to
This flag also prevents script from reading or writing the document.cookie
IDL attribute.
This change makes sure the sandbox attribute protects the integrity as well
as
How do I correctly set a boolean
attributehttp://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#boolean-attributeson
a DOM element object in Javascript?
var script = document.createElement('script');
1. script.async = true;// makes the most sense, but appears go
against the spec
2.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Brian Kuhn bnk...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I correctly set a boolean attribute on a DOM element object in
Javascript?
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.async = true; // makes the most sense, but appears go against
the spec
but it's invalid to set it to anything other than the two values I just
mentioned.
That's the part I'd like to see changed. I understand that if it's present,
it's on. So, why can't async=true be valid? I think all browser vendors
will implement it that way anyway. They'd be crazy not to.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Brian Kuhn bnk...@gmail.com wrote:
but it's invalid to set it to anything other than the two values I just
mentioned.
That's the part I'd like to see changed. I understand that if it's present,
it's on. So, why can't async=true be valid? I think all browser
I can accept that. It's just a shame that true and false can't be supported
for something called a boolean attribute.
Anyone have any thoughts on setAttribute vs. setting the attribute
directly? My test show that they both work.
Thanks,
Brian
On Dec 8, 2009 1:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Brian Kuhn bnk...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I correctly set a boolean attribute on a DOM element object in
Javascript?
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.async = true;
Some clarification is in order; I didn't answer fully and was
corrected elsewhere.
There are two distinct notions of attributes here. The first, the
content attribute, is what you're manipulating when you do
foo.setAttribute() or foo.getAttribute(). The second, the IDL
attribute (may be called
Tab Atkins Jr. schrieb:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Brian Kuhn bnk...@gmail.com wrote:
but it's invalid to set it to anything other than the two values I just
mentioned.
That's the part I'd like to see changed. I understand that if it's present,
it's on. So, why can't async=true be
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Brian Kuhn bnk...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I correctly set a boolean attribute on a DOM element object in
Javascript?
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.async = true; // makes the most sense, but appears go against
the spec
On 08/12/2009 23:04, Garrett Smith wrote:
Setting an attribute to the empty string may have the effect of
removing the attribute in some browsers.
Which browsers/properties?
-dean
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Dean Edwards dean.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/12/2009 23:04, Garrett Smith wrote:
Setting an attribute to the empty string may have the effect of
removing the attribute in some browsers.
Which browsers/properties?
s/removing the attribute/setting a false
Thanks Tab, and everyone else. This has been enlightening!
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Some clarification is in order; I didn't answer fully and was
corrected elsewhere.
There are two distinct notions of attributes here. The first, the
22 matches
Mail list logo
