Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) schrieb:
I would think it preferable if
.name also were allowed to contain that extra information -- currently
we say The name of the file. There are numerous file name variations on
different systems; this is merely the name of the file, without path
information. [1]. I
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:13:52 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
I have no idea how to handle such inconsistent behaviour on the server
side (except adding extra code to flatten all uploaded directory
structures before handling). I assume that HTTP upload should be kept
simple, and
Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:13:52 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
I have no idea how to handle such inconsistent behaviour on the server
side (except adding extra code to flatten all uploaded directory
structures before handling). I assume that HTTP upload
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
Ideally if we were to have a graphics context in a worker we'd want it to be
the standard CanvasRenderingContext2D, the only real problem is that
CanvasRenderingContext2D references the parent canvas element which clearly
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:33:06 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:13:52 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch
wrote:
I have no idea how to handle such
Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:33:06 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:13:52 +0100, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch
wrote:
I have no idea how to handle such inconsistent behaviour on the
server side (except adding
Jeremy Orlow schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
And I mean that if it is important to application developers we
should make it available as a feature and not endorse some plug-in
dependency.
I (and I think most of us) strongly agree.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
Ideally if we were to have a graphics context in a worker we'd want it to
be
the standard CanvasRenderingContext2D, the only real problem is that
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Jeremy Orlow schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
And I mean that if it is important to application developers we
should make it available as a feature and not endorse some
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Weston Ruter wrote:
I've been working on a web app which reads text in a web page, highlighting
each word as it is read. For this to be possible, a Text-To-Speech API is
needed which is able to:
(1) generate the speech audio from some text, and
(2) include the time
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Rohan Prabhu wrote:
i was just wondering, that in the Web Controls 1.0 specifications, in
the psuedo classes specifications, could it be that the psuedo classes
could also be the DOM Events which would modify the style information
attached to it. Like for ex:
Thanks for the discussion - cool to see more interest today also
(http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-December/024453.html)
I've hacked up a proof-of-concept JavaScript API for speech
recognition and synthesis. It adds a navigator.speech object with
these functions:
void
Ok, I sense resistance to putting it in .name. What about .path, undefined
in most cases except where there is an upload including files from multiple
directories, in which case .path contains the path less any path components
common to all 3 (sorry, it's early morning and I can't write well
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:24:37 +0100, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
ife...@google.com wrote:
Ok, I sense resistance to putting it in .name. What about .path,
undefined
in most cases except where there is an upload including files from
multiple
directories, in which case .path contains the path less any
I agree, automatic downloads are the real issue. a href= is fine
because a user must initiate the action (and thus generate a real
pageview).
I'd think that the behavior should be the same in CSS and SVG for
resources that are automatically downloaded.
-Nicholas
Hi,
I just checked in a change which moves the WHATWG from working on
versioned specifications (HTML5) to just working on technology without
trying to version it (HTML).
This doesn't really mean much from the point of view of how the WHATWG
operates, since we've never really paid much
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
CanvasRenderingContext2Ds would never need to be shared between threads
because they're cloned when passed...so is your concern that the libraries
are only meant to ever be used from one thread? Maybe I'm being naive,
Hi Ian,
thanks for suggesting recursive directory selection! This comes almost a bit
surprising to me, since Gears decided to deny this feature (
http://code.google.com/p/gears/wiki/FileSystemAPI). One of the reasons for
the denial still applies: how can the user be sure what he is uploading? If
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
CanvasRenderingContext2Ds would never need to be shared between threads
because they're cloned when passed...so is your concern that the
2009/12/11 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com
Ok, I sense resistance to putting it in .name. What about .path, undefined
in most cases except where there is an upload including files from multiple
directories, in which case .path contains the path less any path components
common to all 3
I was just alerted about this thread from my post Text-To-Speech (TTS) Web
API for JavaScript at
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-December/024453.html.
Amazing how shared ideas like these seem to arise independently at the same
time.
I have a use-case and an additional
(Sending this 2nd time. Hopefully whatwg list doesn't bounce it back.)
On 12/11/09 6:05 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
Thanks for the discussion - cool to see more interest today also
(http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-December/024453.html)
I've hacked up a proof-of-concept
2009/12/11 ddailey ddai...@zoominternet.net:
Circa 1999 I built a little thingy: a client-side animation studio. It
allowed users to point to an image file in local file space. Then I would
preload the file, parse the path name and go looking for images with
consecutively numbered filenames in
on Friday, December 11, 2009 6:11 PM
Jonas Sicking wrote:
I'm fairly certain that any of the major browser vendors would be
quite horrified if this worked today. I.e. if the page could just grab
arbitrary files from the users file system. Occasionally people store
private data there ;)
Hi folks,
So, we were having some internal discussions about the IFRAME sandbox
attribute; Adam Barth suggested it would be more productive to bring
some of the points I was making on the mailing list instead.
I think the attribute is an excellent idea, and close to the dream
design we talked
25 matches
Mail list logo
