Am 05.07.2010 22:50 schrieb Aryeh Gregor:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Some content from an external specialized content provider is included in
an existing web site via an iframe. This cannot be seamless, as the links
in the iframe must point to the
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Thank you and Boris for your examples. I see the security issues. Anyway It
would be very helpful in cases like mine, where security and privacy are not
affected, to get an easy way to do this opt-in without the need of complex
Am 06.07.2010 12:31 schrieb Aryeh Gregor:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Thank you and Boris for your examples. I see the security issues. Anyway It
would be very helpful in cases like mine, where security and privacy are not
affected, to get an easy way to
G'day,
since the discussion is more or less trying to find a solution in the
markup realm (which I thoroughly support), I'm gonna focus on Roger's
proposal of @dpi.
I believe the proposal might work. But assuming you might want to
target 3x resolutions on all img the size of the document will
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:52:24 +0200, André Luís andreluis...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...] i still prefer the way I suggested earlier, to
make img work like the other media tags: video audio, with child
source elements that could have either a resolution=96 (per
proposal of Roger) attribute or a media
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Jul 5, 2010, at 13:10, Marques Johansson wrote:
For the content that is not protected the download or stream is metered
so the client can be charged only for the time they spent watching the
content. We error on the
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Marques Johansson marq...@displague.com wrote:
The company I work for, VOD.com (sfw) (aka Hotmovies .com and clips .com
-
nsfw (spaces added)), offer video on demand services to thousands of
I was looking at jquery, but I am not sure it works. The problem is
that jqeury serializes a web form, where it enters the data in a
field. We need to send the binary data alone.
--Toni
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:14 PM, narendra sisodiya
naren...@narendrasisodiya.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30,
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:19:35 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Jul 5, 2010, at 13:10, Marques Johansson wrote:
For the content that is not protected the download or stream is
metered
so the
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+...@gmail.comsimetrical%2b...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Marques Johansson marq...@displague.com
wrote:
For my purposes I am interested in application-controlled video delivery.
I
want to be able to deliver
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:19:35 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
Is preload=none not enough? I can't imagine the actual bandwidth savings
of more fine-grained control to be significant, probably any
On 6 Jul 2010, at 15:24, Marques Johansson wrote:
A 200 response or partial 206 responses that returns less than the full
requested range is not handled by browsers in a consistent or usable way (for
this purpose). Only Chrome will continue to fetch where the previous short
206 response
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:33:47 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:19:35 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
Is preload=none not enough? I can't imagine
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:24:45 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+...@gmail.comsimetrical%2b...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com
wrote:
For my purposes I am
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:24:45 +0200, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
Some UAs request video without sending Range: bytes 0-. The server has
no
way to negotiate that the UA (a) must use ranges to
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
There are some advantages with input, but overall the design is ugly.
input type=file is buffered, which would seem to exclude the
possibility of onchange=form.submit() in any of its forms' elements,
but is otherwise
James Salsman jsals...@talknicer.com wrote:
[...]
input type=file is buffered, which would seem to exclude the
possibility of onchange=form.submit() in any of its forms' elements,
but is otherwise parsimonious, while device is its unbuffered
counterpart. [...]
What about form
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
My problem is this sentence in the spec for seamless: This will cause links
to open in the parent browsing context.
In an application like http://test.rapid.ch/de/haendler-schweiz/iseki.html,
the external page should be able
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
The benefit to the user is that they could have less open network
connections while streaming video from server controlled sites and those
sites will have the ability to meter their usage more accurately.
Inserting
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:17 -0400, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
My problem is this sentence in the spec for seamless: This will cause links
to open in the parent browsing context.
In an application like
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
The idea of the spec is to enable addressing sub-parts of audio-visual
resources through
Hi all,
I was just reading through the spec and am having trouble understanding
the details of document.charset, document.characterSet, and
document.defaultCharset. It seems to me that document.characterSet is
simply a read-only equivalent of document.charset (I'm guessing these
are both here
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Marques Johansson marq...@displague.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
The idea
On Jul 6, 2010, at 06:19, Marques Johansson wrote:
That being said, I don't think the business models of one of the largest
online video markets should put be on trial through a by a standards list.
Well, if you are suggesting that your use case needs to be addressed by
introducing
24 matches
Mail list logo
