James Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:43 PM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com mailto:da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
Firefox and Chrome disagree about the
On 07/29/2010 12:08 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Other than that, the only safe alternative would be to leave the values
untouched, so the page can say what it wants, the user honor it, and the
server get it as expected; or gracefully degrade to an error message
that actually points to the user
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:32:13 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I've been working under the assumption that we want to eradicate as many
differences between XHTML and HTML as possible, and that there's
virtually
no compatibility constraint on the XHTML side.
If this is an area where we
Why did we want to use a new file extension .manifest in appcache.
Wouldn't it be better to to just use a XML file instead, one benefit
is eliminating the requirement of specifying MIME type in .htaccess.
Regards,
Zi Bin Cheah / 谢子斌
Web Evangelist
/ Developer Relations / Site
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:10:53 +0200, Zi Bin Cheah zi...@opera.com wrote:
Why did we want to use a new file extension .manifest in appcache.
Wouldn't it be better to to just use a XML file instead, one benefit is
eliminating the requirement of specifying MIME type in .htaccess.
XML would be
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Quote:
The defer and async attributes must not be specified if the src
attribute
is not present.
Do it mean if the src attribute is not present, the defer and async
attributes can be not used ? (English is not my native language, :)
)
Yes. I don't know why
People have a very strong feeling about Firefox. This is beautiful, but not
good to it. Firefox is now, over the Windows 7 and Mac, the slowest browser.
Just pick some JavaScripts and test. XUL is the most hard way for builting
an extension and Firefox eats CPU when we run any game built using
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
For example, I think
drawing a 20x20 image into a 500x500 canvas without scaling with a
globalCompositeOperation of 'copy' should result in only the 20x20 region
being cleared out, not the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Leonardo Dutra leodutra...@gmail.com wrote:
But this is not the point.
Composite A within the clipping region over the current canvas bitmap using
the current composition operator.
The word clipping is the point.
No, clipping is not the point either. The
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
For example, I think
drawing a 20x20 image into a 500x500 canvas without scaling with a
globalCompositeOperation of 'copy' should result in only the 20x20 region
being
Even Firefox's implementation is inconsistent.
drawShape uses the infinite transparent black bitmap but drawImage does
not.
I believe even many at Mozilla would like Firefox to switch to the
Chrome/Safari method because it's more easily GPU accelerated.
In that direction it would be nice if 2
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) g...@google.com wrote:
#1) Get rid of the infinite transparent black bitmap stuff and change it
to something that say only pixels inside the shape/image are effected
Like Ian said before, this is fine as soon as someone defines
precisely
Background:
The Web Storage specification provides two ways for web applications to store
key-value data in the browser, effectively replacing cookies for cases when the
server doesn't need the information. For a lot of web application needs,
sessionStorage and localStorage (or some
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Leonardo Dutra leodutra...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, nearly all programming langs were written and based on English. But
this is not a development tool, IDE or language... it's the presentation to
the non-dev user, and it should be easy and independant of language.
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
At the moment, the autofocus attribute specification [1] is quite
permissive: only one element should have the autofocus enabled in the
document but each time an element with autofocus is inserted into the
document, the UA should give it the
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
The section describing the pattern attribute does not explain that it
only applies to particular input types.
However, one of the tables showing which content attributes apply to
which input types shows the pattern attribute only applies to
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
There does not seem to be a standard method of requesting elevated
permissions where local file access or cross-domain file access is
required.
Requesting permissions from whom? The user is not in any place to make
educated decisions about such
On 7/29/2010 3:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
There does not seem to be a standard method of requesting elevated
permissions where local file access or cross-domain file access is
required.
Requesting permissions from whom? The user is not in
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:28:47 +0200, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519928
Suppose we have a script element inside a contenteditable parent.
Should the script run? What about on* attribute event
The e-mails quoted below consist of the salient points of this thread:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, David Bruant wrote:
Make that HTMLCollection (and all HTML*Collection, as a consequence of
inheritence of HTMLCollection) inherit from the ECMAScript Array
prototype. This way, it will make
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Eoin Kilfeather wrote:
I was wondering if any though had been given to a consistant way of
dealing with stereoscopic displays. A use case has come up in a project
I am working on which calls for the use of stereoscopic UIs but I can
find no metion of the term in
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Roger Hågensen wrote:
Idea originally posted at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409508
META name=Ping-prefix content=/trackout/
If the browser see this meta tag it will behave as if ping attribute was
applied to all externally leading hrefs with the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
There are some warnings in browsers for other security items:
This HTTPS Certificate is not valid, Continue / Cancel
That's recognized pretty universally as a horrible prompt that is
actively bad for the user.
It does
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Eitan Adler wrote:
Use case 1:
A document author wants to provide a link to some site. This site has
multiple versions of the page depending on where you live (think
google.co.uk, google.co.hk, google.com etc)
Use case 2:
A document author wants to ask users to share
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Ingo Chao wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-img-element The img must
not be used as a layout tool. In particular, img elements should not be
used to display transparent images, as they rarely convey meaning and
rarely add anything useful to the
Summary: add a new timeref attribute (of type idref) to del and
ins elements that can be used to reference the id of a local to
document time element which is then used as the datetime value of
when the deletion or insertion occurred.
Advantages:
1. encourage more visible data (dates in visible
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Jesse McCarthy wrote:
I see why H2-H6 are retained for certain uses, but -- except in an HGROUP --
there's no good reason to use H2-H6 when writing new code with explicitly
marked-up sections, is there?
The only reason is backwards-compatibility with existing browsers.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
This is the way the webkit canvas implementation has always worked, firefox
implemented this incorrectly, and the spec was based off of that
implementation.
I don't think the spec was based off of that implementation is
Although I was kinda against adding canvas-2D to workers in the past, I
think adding canvas, at least canvas-3D, to workers is going to be essential
for advanced Web gaming to achieve steady frame rates, so I think we're
going to be going there sooner or later.
Rob
--
Now the Bereans were of
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:04 AM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
Erik Arvidsson wrote:
for (var i = 0, length = collection.length; i length; i++)
// instead of:
for (var i = 0; i collection.length; i++)
Actually, the former is a problem when the nodelist is modified in the
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:04 AM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
Erik Arvidsson wrote:
for (var i = 0, length = collection.length; i length; i++)
// instead of:
for (var i = 0; i collection.length; i++)
Actually, the
On 7/29/10, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The e-mails quoted below consist of the salient points of this thread:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, David Bruant wrote:
[...]
Or we can just leave the DOM as it is and get used to calling the
equivalent of Prototype's $A() function.
Before changing
32 matches
Mail list logo
