Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread Giorgio Maone
They would be great additions, thanks. 2. scriptwillexecute/scriptdidexecute events Notice that Opera has a richer set of eventsof this kind (exsposed to privileged User Scripts, though, AFAIK), allowing for much more control over the executing scripts, no matter if from script elements,

[whatwg] Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues

2010-08-17 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi there, http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9546 is about a bug in the HTML-to-Atom algorithm, which only survived in the WHATWG document. Ian has rejected the bug as Invalid use of the bug tracking system. Of course the bug is still there, and the WHATWG document actually

Re: [whatwg] Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues

2010-08-17 Thread Ian Hickson
Please don't cross-post e-mails to the WHATWG list. It causes thread fragmentation. On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Julian Reschke wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9546 is about a bug in the HTML-to-Atom algorithm, which only survived in the WHATWG document. As far as I can tell,

Re: [whatwg] Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues

2010-08-17 Thread Julian Reschke
On 17.08.2010 08:46, Ian Hickson wrote: Please don't cross-post e-mails to the WHATWG list. It causes thread fragmentation. The issue affects both groups. On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Julian Reschke wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9546 is about a bug in the HTML-to-Atom

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 Drag-and-Drop Specification: dragenter

2010-08-17 Thread David Bruant
Le 17/08/2010 02:04, Jason Gross a écrit : Is it possible to get more specificity than just the type of the object being dragged? For example, if I have red images and blue images, and a red target and a blue target, and I want to be able to drop red images only on the red target, and blue

Re: [whatwg] (deferred) script tags with document.write built in

2010-08-17 Thread Brett Zamir
On 8/13/2010 2:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Brett Zamirbret...@yahoo.com wrote: On 8/12/2010 4:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote: Might there be a way thatscript/tags could add an attribute which combined the meaning of both

Re: [whatwg] Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues

2010-08-17 Thread Julian Reschke
On 17.08.2010 10:36, Ian Hickson wrote: ... The note is lower down. It reads: Note: The above algorithm does not guarantee that the output will be a conforming Atom feed. In particular, if insufficient information is provided in the document (e.g. if the document does not have anymeta

[whatwg] scrollIntoView()

2010-08-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Ian has suggested several times so far that I take over editing of the scrollIntoView() method and define it in the CSSOM View Module: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/ I agree that is a more appropriate place. I played around with it a little and it seems that in browsers other than

Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView()

2010-08-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:53:59 +0200, Olli Pettay o...@pettay.fi wrote: What is your testcase here? I was looking at the code and seems like scrollToView is sync in Gecko. And a simple testcase showed that window.scrollY was updated right after the method call. (note, scroll events aren't

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for secure key-value data stores

2010-08-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Dirk Pranke wrote: Nicholas is almost certainly

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread Nicholas Zakas
Really like the idea, though I think the naming of Opera's events (beforescript, afterscript) fit in better with other events on the page (i.e. beforeunload). -Nicholas __ Commander Lock: Dammit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe!

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r5307 - [giow] (0) use vendor--feature instead of _vendor-feature since Apple engineers [...]

2010-08-17 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:32:33 +0200, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: Hmm, good point. Any other suggestions? Mozilla has already added

[whatwg] Case canonicalization for reflected enumerated attributes limited to known values

2010-08-17 Thread Aryeh Gregor
Test case: !doctype html script var el = document.createElement(form); el.setAttribute(method, get); alert(el.method); el.setAttribute(method, GET); alert(el.method); /script Spec: If a reflecting IDL attribute is a DOMString whose content attribute is an enumerated attribute,

Re: [whatwg] Fwd: Discussing WebSRT and alternatives/improvements

2010-08-17 Thread Julian Reschke
On 12.08.2010 10:09, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: ... The core problem is that WebSRT is far too compatible with existing SRT usage. Regardless of the file extension and MIME type used, it's quite improbable that anyone will have different parsers for the same format. Once media players have been

Re: [whatwg] Case canonicalization for reflected enumerated attributes limited to known values

2010-08-17 Thread Aryeh Gregor
Actually, it goes further than that. Everyone but IE seems to just return the value of the content attribute when you do a get on the IDL attribute: !doctype html script var el = document.createElement(form); el.setAttribute(method, invalid value); alert(el.method); /script IE alerts get,

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread John J Barton
whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 -0700 From: Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc To: WHAT Working Group wha...@whatwg.org Subject: [whatwg] script features Message-ID: aanlktin3t5zb4druxj8ws_hiusgs3pmozl8wogrtc...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r5307 - [giow] (0) use vendor--feature instead of _vendor-feature since Apple engineers [...]

2010-08-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:20 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: Is this supposed to be a general policy? We couldn't determine whether to go with or without dashes when naming an attribute in the bidi meeting a few months ago - current practice seems to go both ways, from a

Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView()

2010-08-17 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote: On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:53:59 +0200, Olli Pettay o...@pettay.fi wrote: What is your testcase here? I was looking at the code and seems like scrollToView is sync in Gecko. And a simple testcase showed that

Re: [whatwg] Fwd: Discussing WebSRT and alternatives/improvements

2010-08-17 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:11:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:32 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: [whatwg] Fwd: Discussing WebSRT and alternatives/improvements

2010-08-17 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote: On 12.08.2010 10:09, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: ... The core problem is that WebSRT is far too compatible with existing SRT usage. Regardless of the file extension and MIME type used, it's quite improbable that

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 -0700 From: Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc To: WHAT Working Group wha...@whatwg.org Subject: [whatwg] script features Message-ID:        

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread John J Barton
Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 -0700 From: Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc To: WHAT Working Group wha...@whatwg.org

Re: [whatwg] Timestamp from video source in order to sync (e.g. expose OGG timestamp to javascript)

2010-08-17 Thread Ian Hickson
I've defined an explicit concept of a media timeline and defined how you use it, which should make a lot of video-related issues better. On Mon, 17 May 2010, Odin Omdal H�rthe wrote: I stream conferences using Ogg Theora+Vorbis using Icecast2. I have built a site that shows the video and

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:14 PM, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 -0700 From: Jonas Sicking

Re: [whatwg] script features

2010-08-17 Thread John J. Barton
On 8/17/2010 6:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: ... [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#executing-a-script-block Ok so I see where executing a script block becomes executing script. (though I'm not sure which environment is compiled in other than the global object, which you