Am 31.12.2010 17:30 schrieb Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Martin Janeckewhatwg@kaor.in wrote:
[snip]
Apart from informing human readers about the correct reproduction of a
misspelled word, a HTMLsic would indicate the same to web applications.
Think of a search
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Would search engines benefit from markup for this?
They could actually benefit, if the correct spelling would be added in an
attribute, so they could match the misspelled word with a correctly spelled
search term; somehow
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/2/11 2:51 PM, Diego Perini wrote:
Of course this require file security privileges
(security.fileuri.strict_origin_policy = true)
You mean false.
Yes, need to set that to false to have those privileges.
That option
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 07:39:02 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
+ I've made track have a feature whereby a track can be enabled by
default so that users who would otherwise not have any tracks enabled
will get it enabled (without overriding the preferences of users who
would have
On 12/31/2010 02:13 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
It's not entirely clear to me what the intended UI is here. If the goal is
to only style form elements for (in)validity after they've lost focus or
after their form is submitted, it seems a couple of scripts onform
would be the way to go:
form
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:50 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
To use a different style for the cues that are sung together, so that
you know when it's your turn to sing.
It's not clear whether multiple voices is really necessary. Can't you
just
do (using the new syntax):
Can someone please let me know how to unsubscribe? Many thanks.
Sincerely,
Craig S. Kiessling
www.PathsAtlanta.org http://www.pathsatlanta.org - Martial Arts More
www.CSKnet.net http://www.csknet.net - SEO More
/www.AtlantaMahjong.com http://www.atlantamahjong.com - The Mahjong Source
in
I thought that the issue was settled as well, but after talking to Ian Hixie
and Philip Taylor, Ian indicated that if someone provides a clear formulation
of the spec text that matches webkit behavior, the spec would likely be changed
to match that.
I have proposed the changes below, but got no
On 1/3/11 7:47 AM, Diego Perini wrote:
I am switching that bit on/off when I need it (and the RS232/USB
device is connected), I am not asking others to do it.
So while it's off, the user is vulnerable. Is the software doing this a
Firefox extension?
Mostly I am looking for other browser
By the way, the WebSRT hit from Google
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/websrt.html) is
404. I've had to read it out of the Google cache, since I'm not sure
where it went.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
But what's the use case? Is
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/3/11 7:47 AM, Diego Perini wrote:
I am switching that bit on/off when I need it (and the RS232/USB
device is connected), I am not asking others to do it.
So while it's off, the user is vulnerable. Is the software
On 1/3/11, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/3/11 7:47 AM, Diego Perini wrote:
Mostly I am looking for other browser to implement this serial access
like Firefox does
Firefox doesn't implement serial access. It just reads files. What's
exposed as files on a Unix system can be ...
On 1/2/11, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, who says you're using a browser that puts different tabs in
different threads; that that browser would still work correctly if you
suspend a single thread and leave the others running; and that you
even know that it's possible
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
You are correct, Firefox doesn't implement serial access by itself, it
just let me use the OS directly (if security configuration
restrictions are removed).
Please remember that HTML5 file access does not give you a
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
By the way, the WebSRT hit from Google
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/websrt.html) is
404. I've had to read it out of the Google cache, since I'm not sure
where it went.
The format was renamed to WebVTT:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
So next question is why allow Adobe Flash and plug-ins in general to
do that wildly and not allow others to have the same capability and be
so paranoid about security when that is already broken by other means
at higher
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:25 AM, carol.sz...@nokia.com wrote:
I thought that the issue was settled as well, but after talking to Ian
Hixie and Philip Taylor, Ian indicated that if someone provides a clear
formulation of the spec text that matches webkit behavior, the spec would
likely be
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
You are correct, Firefox doesn't implement serial access by itself, it
just let me use the OS directly (if security configuration
restrictions are
18 matches
Mail list logo
