The p element (ever since it became an element) has always allowed inline
(text-level) content only, and no change is planned to this in HTML5. Under
these circumstances, what should we say to people to need to use paragraphs
that contain lists, for example?
A paragraph, in the old
On 03/10/2011 09:20 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
My question is: Is this acceptable use of the SECTION element, even in a
flow that mostly consists of P elements, not wrapped inside SECTION
elements of their own?
If I understand you correctly, it is not the intended use of section —
i.e.
On 10 March 2011 08:20, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
what should we say to people to need to use paragraphs
that contain lists, for example?
This has concerned me for some time.
Consider a more complex scenario:
pI always like to eat these cheeses:/p
ul
liCheddar
liStilton
Am 10.03.2011 17:58 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
On 10 March 2011 08:20, Jukka K. Korpelajkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
what should we say to people to need to use paragraphs
that contain lists, for example?
This has concerned me for some time.
Consider a more complex scenario:
pI always like to eat
Markus Ernst wrote:
Would it cause serious issues to add the Phrasing Content category to
these three elements [ol, ul, dl] thus allowing them inside the p element?
I'm afraid it would, and I think that's the reason why the content model
hasn't been extended in HTML5.
Consider
psome
On 3/3/11, Dave Kok upda...@davekok.net wrote:
Here is a more formal proposal for Session Management. Hoping to get
more traction.
Your former proposal was very well formed. The only thing I don't see is a
good use case making this proposal worthy of endorsement and
implementation.
SCOPE
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Diogo Resende drese...@thinkdigital.pt wrote:
That is perfect for 1 date scope. What if I have a meeting to schedule in a
month (eg. March) and (according to other meeting attendees) the meeting can
only happen from 10-15, 19, 20-28 and 30. Do I have to make a
