As a web developer, if I wanted access to the password, I would then avoid
using the input type=password field, and create my own field that reads
characters (perhaps via onkeyup), and fakes a password field visually.
I also think it's a bad idea to change the behavior of input
type=password
We would likely end up with some more of these lovely interfaces:
https://online.westpac.com.au/
Try using that without a mouse and not going insane/grossly disclosing
your input to anyone paying mild attention to your screen.
Tom
On 11/07/2011 23:29, Sean Connelly wrote:
As a web
Þann lau 9.júl 2011 04:29, skrifaði Hugh Guiney:
6.1 On that note, why is the spec enabling the use of unstyled spans
to achieve alternative rendering? Doesn't this give meaning (however
contextual) to an element that is supposed to be semantically neutral?
Can you think of any other uses for
Þann sun 10.júl 2011 08:08, skrifaði Alex Vincent:
/**
* Check if a password field's value matches another.
*
* @param otherPassword Another password element.
*
* @throws Error if this.type != password
* @throws Error if other.type != password
*
* @returns Boolean True if the
On 7/8/11, Jeremy Keith jer...@adactio.com wrote:
Bjartur wrote:
Citation will most likely contain the cited resource (@cite), the title
of the cited resource (@title) and the date and optionally time of the
quote (@datetime?).
All three of which are invisible and so do not match the use
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Hugh Guiney hugh.gui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
I was in the process of coding a prototype for a site I'm working on
when I decided that certain nav's should actually be menu's.
While the basic concept is apparent, unfortunately, with zero browser
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Alex Vincent ajvinc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Michal Zalewski lcam...@coredump.cxwrote:
For the last 10+ years, password inputs have been accessible from
scripts,
with nary a complaint. If I have this code:
Unfortunately, the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Sean Connelly s...@pbwhere.com wrote:
As a web developer, if I wanted access to the password, I would then avoid
using the input type=password field, and create my own field that reads
characters (perhaps via onkeyup), and fakes a password field visually.
Then
Hi,
Based on comments in the File API Streaming
Blobshttp://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029973.html
thread and
my Extending HTML 5 video for adaptive
streaminghttp://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-June/032277.html
thread,
I decided on taking a stab
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
, On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Using this value as a clock for media synchronization
It seems to me that the spec is written assuming only one media element is
consuming the MediaSource. But nothing stops multiple elements consuming the
same URL simultaneously. Maybe instead of going through a URL you should add
API directly to media elements.
bytesAvailable is for flow control?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Chris Rogers crog...@google.com wrote:
In the CoreAudio case, the AudioTimeStamp contains *both* the host-time
(system clock) and the sample time (based on audio hardware). This creates
a relationship between the two clocks. As an example of how these two
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Suppose we wanted to sync animation (either scripted animation or CSS
animation) to audio. We'd want them to use the audio clock, right?
For that you need the play cursor of the actual audio sample you're
Hi,
Mozilla and Cisco have been working on an API for real time
communication, which we sent out today to the W3C WebRTC working group
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2011Jul/0010.html).
It builds on both the WHATWG RTC proposal by Ian Hickson as well as the
MediaStream
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Suppose we wanted to sync animation (either scripted animation or CSS
animation) to audio. We'd want them to use the audio clock, right?
For
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Suppose we wanted to sync animation (either scripted animation
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Anant Narayanan an...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi,
Mozilla and Cisco have been working on an API for real time communication,
which we sent out today to the W3C WebRTC working group
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2011Jul/0010.html). It
builds on
17 matches
Mail list logo
