On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Looking
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:39 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
If it's ok if it's entirely ignored, then it's presentational, and not
conveying any useful information.
Presentational markup may convey useful information, for example that a
quotation from printed matter contains an underlined
On 2011-07-26 07:30, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Per-Erik Brodin wrote:
Perhaps now that there is no longer any relation to tracks on the media
elements we could also change Track to something else, maybe Component.
I have had people complaining to me that Track is not really a
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29,
Hello Anne,
I took a look at the X-Frame-Options and it only disallows displaying
in a frame, not forbidding only script access.
Also this is another case of a HTTP header that would also find a good
place in the HTML itself, like with the Content-Disposition attribute
I suggested (and now got
Am 02.08.2011, 12:38 Uhr, schrieb Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:33:18 +0200, Dennis Joachimsthaler
den...@efjot.de wrote:
I took a look at the X-Frame-Options and it only disallows displaying
in a frame, not forbidding only script access.
What kind of script
Am 02.08.2011, 13:00 Uhr, schrieb Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:48:06 +0200, Dennis Joachimsthaler
den...@efjot.de wrote:
Say, there's a site which uses an autologin facility to automatically
log their users in when the site is opened.
Malicious guy #1 prepares a
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:05:07 +0200, Dennis Joachimsthaler
den...@efjot.de wrote:
It is not possible anyway? That kind of renders my worries baseless.
Right.
But this use case still holds: Userscripts and addons could still read
out everything from the sites.
It might be way too much a
Am 02.08.2011, 13:12 Uhr, schrieb Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
If users cannot trust their userscripts and addons (provided they can do
unsafe things) they have lost already.
True. We do not make standards solely to protect inexperienced users.
Thank you for your insight on this
Þann þri 2.ágú 2011 09:04, skrifaði Henri Sivonen:
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:39 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
Presentational markup may convey useful information, for example that a
quotation from printed matter contains an underlined word.
HTML is the wrong language for this kind of thing.
I
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Dennis Joachimsthaler den...@efjot.dewrote:
Am 02.08.2011, 13:12 Uhr, schrieb Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
If users cannot trust their userscripts and addons (provided they can do
unsafe things) they have lost already.
True. We do not make standards
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 13:55 +, aykut.sen...@bild.de wrote:
I would like to know if these attributes will be part of HTML5 or is
there another valid method to integrate RDFa into HTML5?
Why do you need RDFa?
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, aykut.sen...@bild.de wrote:
according to the W3C Specification:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/
1. the xmlns attribute has been replaced with the prefix attribute
example: html prefix=rdfa:
http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa#;http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa#%22
2. the RDFa
This is a very nice proposal; thanks for working on this, Ryosuke! I
have a number of questions and concerns on it, and I would appreciate if
you can comment on these:
1. The definition of @undoscope seems to not address the question of
whether the document element should be an Undo Scope or
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ehsan Akhgari eh...@mozilla.com wrote:
This is a very nice proposal; thanks for working on this, Ryosuke! I have
a number of questions and concerns on it, and I would appreciate if you can
comment on these:
Nope! I just REALLY want to fix this.
1. The
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
I think the manual transaction is what I'd want to make undo/redo in
the edit menu work with jV
[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/jv/]*.
That's great to hear! I've spent so much time reconciling the way managed
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone reviewing the spec should be advised that I put extensive
rationale in HTML comments. If you want to know why the spec says
what it does, check the HTML source. I plan to change this to use
details or such
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
I think the manual transaction is what I'd want to make undo/redo in
the edit menu work with jV
[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/jv/]*.
That's
On the subject of diagnostics for appcache:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 15:21, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I just tested Chrome beta this morning and saw nothing interesting
in appcache error
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Mike Hanson wrote:
On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Simon Heckmann wrote:
I have read a lot in the last month about the future of html and web
applications and I am very impressed by the progress this makes.
However, I have
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
On 5/4/11, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
IMO browsers should implement link. link should be implementable
cross-browser in CSS.
Unfortunately, what we want and what we get don't always match. :-)
On a more serious note, implementing link
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
Şann şri 2.ágú 2011 09:04, skrifaği Henri Sivonen:
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:39 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
Presentational markup may convey useful information, for example that a
quotation from printed matter
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
04.05.2011, в 15:38, Ian Hickson написал(а):
There seems to be no provision in the spec for a behavior Firefox and
IE (and now WebKit-based browsers, too) have. If window.print() is
called during page load, then its action is delayed until
A common request that maybe we can agree upon is the ability to list the
manifests that are cached and to delete them via script. Something
like...
String[] window.applicationCache.getManifests(); // returns appcache
manifest for the origin
void
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Michael Nordman wrote:
A common request that maybe we can agree upon is the ability to list the
manifests that are cached and to delete them via script. Something
like...
String[] window.applicationCache.getManifests(); // returns appcache
manifest for the origin
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Michael Nordman wrote:
A common request that maybe we can agree upon is the ability to list
the
manifests that are cached and to delete them via script. Something
like...
String[]
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Michael Nordman wrote:
A common request that maybe we can agree upon is the ability to list
the
manifests that are cached and to delete them via script. Something
like...
String[]
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Michael Nordman wrote:
If you actively want to seek out old manifests, sure, but what's the
use case for doing that? It would be like trying to actively evict
things from HTTP caches.
You should talk to some app developers. View source on angry birds for a
use
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Michael Nordman wrote:
Let's say there's a page in the cache to be used as a fallback resource,
refers to the manifest by relative url...
html manifest='x'
Depending on the url that invokes the fallback resource, 'x' will be
resolved to different absolute
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Feedback on sections 1 through 3:
- WebKit treats any font-weight above or equal to 600 as bold because
that's what user sees, and boldness is a binary concept in execCommand;
Firefox 5 appears to do the same.
30 matches
Mail list logo
