Re: [whatwg] Support for RDFa in HTML5

2012-03-12 Thread Philipp Serafin
I admit, I haven't really followed this debate. But out of interest: Is it by now actually possible to write any kind of implementation that complies to both, the HTML5 *and* the RDFa specification? Regards, Philipp Serafin Am Dienstag, 2. August 2011 19:32:52 schrieb Ian Hickson: On Tue, 2

Re: [whatwg] Support for RDFa in HTML5

2012-03-12 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Philipp Serafin phil...@gmail.com wrote: I admit, I haven't really followed this debate. But out of interest: Is it by now actually possible to write any kind of implementation that complies to both, the HTML5 *and* the RDFa specification? As Ian said, the

Re: [whatwg] Support for RDFa in HTML5

2012-03-12 Thread Manu Sporny
On 03/12/12 15:00, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Philipp Serafin phil...@gmail.com wrote: I admit, I haven't really followed this debate. But out of interest: Is it by now actually possible to write any kind of implementation that complies to both, the HTML5

[whatwg] Validator.nu: Attribute role not allowed on element h2 at this point.

2012-03-12 Thread Hugh Guiney
Why not? I have this in an otherwise-valid HTML5 + SVG 1.1 + MathML 2.0 + RDFa Lite 1.1 document: hgroup h1Company Name/h1 h2 role=presentationTagline/h2 /hgroup Spec says: Authors must not set the ARIA role and aria-* attributes in a manner that conflicts with the semantics described

Re: [whatwg] UndoManager: Nested transactions and execCommand

2012-03-12 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
I agree that nested transactions are a bad idea, and we probably don't want them. Cheers, -- Ehsan http://ehsanakhgari.org/ On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: Hi, Consider the following scenario: div id=um1 undoscopespan id=um2 undoscope/span/div script

Re: [whatwg] Validator.nu: Attribute role not allowed on element h2 at this point.

2012-03-12 Thread Charles Pritchard
Ignore the error, the HTML5 spec does not reflect implementations in this section about ARIA. The warning is not helpful to authors nor does it accurately describe the means in which ATs work with ARIA. -Charles On 3/12/2012 4:27 PM, Hugh Guiney wrote: Why not? I have this in an

Re: [whatwg] Validator.nu: Attribute role not allowed on element h2 at this point.

2012-03-12 Thread Charles Pritchard
To clarify: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110405/author/content-models.html#annotations-for-assistive-technology-products-aria the presentation role may always be used.. The validator should not have thrown an error for role=presentation. The section was made because: exceptions are

Re: [whatwg] Validator.nu: Attribute role not allowed on element h2 at this point.

2012-03-12 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote: Why not? I have this in an otherwise-valid HTML5 + SVG 1.1 + MathML 2.0 + RDFa Lite 1.1 document: hgroup h1Company Name/h1 h2 role=presentationTagline/h2 /hgroup Spec says: Authors must not set the ARIA�role�and�aria-*�attributes in a

Re: [whatwg] Validator.nu: Attribute role not allowed on element h2 at this point.

2012-03-12 Thread Charles Pritchard
On 3/12/2012 5:52 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Charles Pritchard wrote: Ignore the error, the HTML5 spec does not reflect implementations in this section about ARIA. The warning is not helpful to authors nor does it accurately describe the means in which ATs work with