Re: [whatwg] register*Handler and Web Intents

2012-08-09 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
I also agree with Henri and James. I would be opposed to implementing the feature in WebKit the way it is currently proposed. The aesthetic benefit is not great enough to be worth the breakage. Consider in particular that the following proposed markup: intent action=edit

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-09 Thread Andy Davies
On 8 August 2012 17:44, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote: Hi Markus, You wrote: Anyway, with your proposal, would this be valid, to address the bandwidth-only use case?: img src=normal.jpg alt= srcset=high.jpg 2x, normal.jpg 1x You don't need the , normal.jpg 1x because src= has

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-09 Thread Kornel Lesi��ski
On 8 sie 2012, at 12:57, Florian Rivoal flori...@opera.com wrote: Is there a good reason to believe that * will be something other than a power of two? That is, could we just optimize the *x syntax away and specify that the first option is 1x, the second is 2x, the third is 4x, etc.? If

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-09 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Kornel Lesi__ski kor...@geekhood.net schrieb am Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:29:17 +0100: On 8 sie 2012, at 12:57, Florian Rivoal flori...@opera.com wrote: […] If you look at mobile phones, there are a bunch of existing devices with 1.5 device pixel per css pixel, and also some with 2.25, so I

Re: [whatwg] Real-time thread support for workers

2012-08-09 Thread David Bruant
Le 09/08/2012 02:20, Jussi Kalliokoski a écrit : Hello there! On W3C AudioWG we're currently discussing the possibility of having web workers that run in a priority/RT thread. This would be highly useful for example to keep audio from glitching even under high CPU stress. There are 3 sources

Re: [whatwg] Real-time thread support for workers

2012-08-09 Thread Jussi Kalliokoski
Hello David, On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote: Le 09/08/2012 02:20, Jussi Kalliokoski a écrit : Hello there! On W3C AudioWG we're currently discussing the possibility of having web workers that run in a priority/RT thread. This would be highly useful

Re: [whatwg] Was is considered to use JSON-LD instead of creating application/microdata+json?

2012-08-09 Thread Markus Lanthaler
On Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:18 AM, Ian Hickson wrote. On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote: I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead of creating application/microdata+json. The resulting output would be more or less the same. It wasn't. What

Re: [whatwg] Was is considered to use JSON-LD instead of creating application/microdata+json?

2012-08-09 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote: The only reason there's a MIME type at all (rather than just using JSON's directly) was to enable filtering of copy-and-paste and drag-and-drop payloads; would JSON-LD enable that also? Sure, I see no reason why not. Could you give an

Re: [whatwg] Real-time thread support for workers

2012-08-09 Thread Janusz Majnert
Yes. Especially in mobile devices it makes a world of difference when for example on a single-core phone you have an audio app in the foreground, and a Twitter client in the background. If the Twitter client decides to update its content, the audio is most likely to glitch and this is most

Re: [whatwg] Real-time thread support for workers

2012-08-09 Thread David Bruant
Le 09/08/2012 09:59, Jussi Kalliokoski a écrit : Hello David, Hi Jussi, On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com mailto:bruan...@gmail.com wrote: * The last source is your own content competing with itself for CPU. *snip* One question I have is whether

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-09 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Andy Davies dajdav...@gmail.com wrote: Would also like to see if there's a way of using srcset to hint to the UA that it can skip the image under low throughput conditions e.g. GPRS. Same would apply to image-set in CSS The image-set() function already includes

Re: [whatwg] Real-time thread support for workers

2012-08-09 Thread Jussi Kalliokoski
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:09 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote: Le 09/08/2012 09:59, Jussi Kalliokoski a écrit : Hello David, Hi Jussi, On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote: * The last source is your own content competing with itself for CPU.

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-09 Thread Kornel Lesi��ski
On 9 sie 2012, at 11:06, Nils Dagsson Moskopp n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote: I don't think anybody will take advantage of that. IMHO non-integer ratios are a mistake that can/will be corrected. Limiting to powers of two because it can/will be “simpler” in this case not only makes

Re: [whatwg] StringEncoding: Allowed encodings for TextEncoder

2012-08-09 Thread Joshua Bell
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:48 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote: On 08/07/2012 07:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I don't mind supporting *decoding* from basically any encoding that Anne's spec enumerates. I don't