On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
It seems to me a synchronous constructor that creates an ImageBitmap for
a subimage of another ImageBitmap (but not other kind of source!)
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:25:19 +0100, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote:
Nils Dagsson Moskopp n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net schrieb am Tue, 18
Dec 2012 17:01:40 +0100:
[…]
I therefore prefer a declarative way of linking to timed resources
embedded in their original
Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com schrieb am Wed, 19 Dec 2012
11:19:14 +0100:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:25:19 +0100, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote:
Nils Dagsson Moskopp n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net schrieb am
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:01:40 +0100:
[…]
I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
What should a browser do with a URL ending with #foot=10 if there is an
element on the page with id=foot=10? What about #foobar if there is an
element with id=foo? I would be surprised if treating #foo the same as
#foo
Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org schrieb am Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:09:59
-0600:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.comwrote:
What should a browser do with a URL ending with #foot=10 if there
is an element on the page with id=foot=10? What about #foobar
if there is
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
It seems to me a synchronous constructor that creates an
On 12/18/12 3:25 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Looking at the spec and at browsers more carefully, it seems that this is
actually per spec (i.e. the spec says to follow the link).
Does it say to do that if the ownerDocument of the a has no associated
browsing context? What if it's not the currently
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/18/12 3:25 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Looking at the spec and at browsers more carefully, it seems that this
is actually per spec (i.e. the spec says to follow the link).
Does it say to do that if the ownerDocument of the a has no associated
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it also handled HD backing stores automatically, like drawImage
does?
I think so.
Rob
--
Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the
Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials
On 12/19/12 12:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
So I've put in a block on the handling of a (and area) elements
specifically, making their activation behaviour nil if their doc doesn't
have a browsing context
Does a document that is in something like bfcache or has otherwise been
unloaded have a
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
So I've put in a block on the handling of a (and area) elements
specifically, making their activation behaviour nil if their doc
doesn't have a browsing context
Does a document that is in something like
On 12/19/12 12:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Yes, just not an active one.
OK. I don't think we want to activate links in unloaded documents,
personally
-Boris
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I haven't added this, because contenteditable= is only truly useful
with scripting enabled, and it's basically one line of script to
support shunting the current value into a hidden
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Yes, just not an active one.
OK. I don't think we want to activate links in unloaded documents,
personally
That's probably reasonable... Do you have a test case? :-)
--
Ian Hickson
On 12/19/12 12:55 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Yes, just not an active one.
OK. I don't think we want to activate links in unloaded documents,
personally
That's probably reasonable... Do you have a test case?
Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com schrieb am Wed, 19 Dec 2012
11:19:14 +0100:
[…]
Redefining/extending what the fragment component does for HTML is
somewhat risky, so it really comes down to what exactly the
processing should be.
What should a browser do with a URL ending with #foot=10
16 matches
Mail list logo
