Is there not some way we can have a lineDash attribute that returns a
manipulatable object that inherits from Array rather than the current
Java-like API? I remember this was discussed when getLineDash() and
setLineDash() were added, but I think it's worth taking another look
at this.
(For URLs I
Hi Ian,
in regards to your post about how main is defined:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Dec/0239.html
the main element [2] is being standardised at the w3c not the whatwg and as
such, the whatwg list moderator has requested that discussion not continue
on this
From: Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
There's no advantage. In fact it is an entirely useless feature as far as
I can tell. :-)
Ok, thank you. At least that makes sense...in a weird sort of way.
On 22/12/12 10:06 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is there not some way we can have a lineDash attribute that returns a
manipulatable object that inherits from Array rather than the current
Java-like API? I remember this was discussed when getLineDash() and
setLineDash() were added, but I think
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Does it need to inherit from Array? I think we can do this as long as the
canvas context object does not need to watch the Array object for changes.
(This is technically already possible by just using object as the type,
On 23/12/12 12:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I guess dashList is somewhat simpler, but I think it would be nice if
it still did type coercion.
In that case, I guess we are reliant on whatever ES-allowed Array
extending is possible, and I haven't followed that for a bit. Is this
actually
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
On 23/12/12 12:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I guess dashList is somewhat simpler, but I think it would be nice if
it still did type coercion.
In that case, I guess we are reliant on whatever ES-allowed Array extending
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
On 23/12/12 12:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I guess dashList is somewhat simpler, but I think it would be nice if
it still did type
On 23/12/12 1:01 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
Array-like objects which don't inherit from the Array object and are
thus missing methods one would expect to find on them (forEach, join,
etc.) is one of the biggest WTF of the Web platform. We should be doing
whatever it takes to fix this.
I agree
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
If we don't have the type checking of array elements, and also don't need
any noticing of individual element assignments, then we can just have a
reference to a plain Array object and look at its elements at the time the
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is there not some way we can have a lineDash attribute that returns a
manipulatable object that inherits from Array rather than the current
Java-like API? I remember this was discussed when getLineDash() and
setLineDash() were added, but I
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is there not some way we can have a lineDash attribute that returns a
manipulatable object that inherits from Array rather than the current
Java-like API? I remember this was
On 12/22/12 6:07 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
If we don't have the type checking of array elements, and also don't
need any noticing of individual element assignments, then we can just
have a reference to a plain Array object and look at its elements at the
time the dash array is needed.
Look
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info. I had sent it to public-html-comme...@w3.org and had
added new info to Bugzilla.
Regards,
Ian Yang
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ian,
in regards to your post about how main is defined:
14 matches
Mail list logo
