On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:15 AM, James Burke jrbu...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Ability to pass data with the Notification
Right now, we URL-encode some args to the iconURL to pass data to the
handler function that is registered via
navigator.mozSetMessageHandler('notification', function(){}) [1].
Would you mind looking at the proposal
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/CanvasInWorkers and commenting on it? This
was arrived at after extensive discussions with the Google Maps team,
and addresses their key use cases. Compared to the one below, it
solves the following problems:
1) Rendering from a
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Gryllida wrote:
Usecase 1: I search for python and see a link to their website in search
results, and the search engine looks up both title and IRC info - so I
see webpage title, and a link to its irc network or channel.
There's nothing stopping search engines today from
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Cameron Jones wrote:
http://cameronjones.github.com/form-http-extensions/index.html
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Cameron Jones wrote:
The motivations are the same which support declarative over imperative
programming, access to the HTTP protocol methods and headers (ETags,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:52:49 +0200, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
You'd actually write CSS.escape, so that's basically the longer,
different name. Is that sufficient?
I don't want to bikeshed over this, but I was thinking of perhaps
serializeIdent(), or escapeIdent().
The API is
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
Would you mind looking at the proposal
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/CanvasInWorkers and commenting on it?
Sure. Kyle and I looked at it while we were working on our proposal. The
main issues I have with it are that
Ping?
Mozilla would like to know if anyone else is interested or specially if people
are NOT interested. We would like to implement this and expose it on the
platform.
See:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780953
On Friday, July 26, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
One of the use cases that has come up for why people are still using
plugins is supporting scanning to the web, in particular multi-page
scanning. It seems to me that we could hook this up to input
type=file multiple, but that we should try to
Over the years I've collected a number of threads on this list that were
requesting features (as opposed to reporting bugs), and which lacked
immediate interest from more than one browser vendor. I collected a bunch
of them and filed bugs for them back in July:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Ping?
Mozilla would like to know if anyone else is interested or specially if
people are NOT interested. We would like to implement this and expose it
on the platform.
See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780953
I was just
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
For now I intend to focus on implementing the scanning UI in the browser
and just handing the site the final product. Any thoughts of exposing a
fine-grained control over previews
I've ran into the following layout issue while using the accessibility audit
extension on Chrome.
https://github.com/GoogleChrome/accessibility-developer-tools/issues/64
In brief, there is an accessibility issue with floated images within an
anchor element,
which is present on the web on a
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Leaving aside the issue that CSS-escape is more than one operation
depending on what kind of token you're creating,
My understanding is that you can do both of them, at least for
selector-related escaping, so the author doesn't
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
For now I intend to focus on implementing the scanning UI in the
browser and just handing the site the final product. Any thoughts of
Does providing a means to scan-to-the-web make web developers a new group
for patent trolls to target?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/scanning-documents-patent-trolls-want-you-pay
Rick
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Jonas Sicking
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Rick Waldron wrote:
Does providing a means to scan-to-the-web make web developers a new group
for patent trolls to target?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/scanning-documents-patent-trolls-want-you-pay
Only your own legal counsel can determine that for you.
--
Ian
16 matches
Mail list logo