2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag it doesn't recognize in the head, it creates a fake body tag and
pushes the tag down into the body.
But you could use style type=text/foobar.../style, with a suitable
value for foobar,
Hi,
I don’t know if this is the right place to ask for but I couldn’t find any
information stored in the received emails from this list about the online
archived version.
In the mails from w3c there is a header tag with the reference to the archived
version but I couldn’t find one here.
If
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag it doesn't recognize in the head, it creates a fake body tag and
pushes the tag down into the body.
But you
On 12.11.2013, at 09:11, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag it doesn't recognize in the head, it creates a
On 12.11.2013, at 09:08, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag it doesn't recognize in the head, it creates a fake body tag and
pushes the tag down into the body.
But you could
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Anselm Hannemann
i...@anselm-hannemann.com wrote:
If it’s the wrong place here, could you forward it to the right persons or
tell me where to ask for such feature-requests?
This is hard to solve giving the software we use last I checked. I
recommend bookmarking
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-11-12 10:14, Anselm Hannemann wrote:
no, a preload scanner will never (okay, never say never) interpret CSS.
This is against the rule of it to improve performance before interpreting
layout.
This whole thing is
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi
wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head.
Am 12.11.2013 14:33 schrieb Ryosuke Niwa:
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag
2013-11-12 17:52, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
No, we can't gate any of the major use-cases behind a time barrier
(waiting for external CSS to come in) like that.
Why does it need to be *external* CSS? Surely external style sheets are
generally preferred, but if you want inline code, what is the
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:04 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
We could define some ways to list set of images that could be
replaced for a given img element in HTML and then let CSS pick which
one to use for example.
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
img.artdirected {
Am 12.11.2013 17:48 schrieb Markus Lanthaler:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:04 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
We could define some ways to list set of images that could be
replaced for a given img element in HTML and then let CSS pick which
one to use for example.
style type=text/css
@media
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 12.11.2013 17:48 schrieb Markus Lanthaler:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:04 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
We could define some ways to list set of images that could be
replaced for a given img element in HTML and then let
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:50 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background-image: image-set(url(small.png) 1x,
This is possible using a set of proposals already underway, last I checked in
on them: http://nicolasgallagher.com/responsive-images-using-css3/ Considering
the delay involved in skipping the preparser and waiting for CSS to download
(as well as the fact that the `src` *will* be prefetched,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background-image: image-set(url(small.png) 1x,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Markus Lanthaler
markus.lantha...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:50 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
Really? An empty div element? What about accessibility or When CSS cannot be
loaded? What if only html is grabbed by another page? It doesn't seem to be a
really solid solution in my opinion.
Anselm
On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background-image: image-set(url(small.png) 1x,
[Please don't top-post. Quote the relevant parts of the message
you're responding to.]
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Anselm Hannemann
i...@anselm-hannemann.com wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, John Mellor joh...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, John Mellor joh...@google.com wrote:
- Doesn't address viewport-switching (variable-sized images), though we
may
be able to fix that by extending image-set to support src-N's
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
Why doesn't it support variable-sized images? In example above, one
of the cases is 30x30 and the other is 60x60. Maybe I've
misunderstood what you mean by variable-sized images?
It doesn't support a *compact syntax for
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:54:54 -0800
From: Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com
To: John Mellor joh...@google.com
Cc: Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi, Markus Ernst
derer...@gmx.ch, whatwg whatwg@lists.whatwg.org,
Markus Lanthaler
markus.lantha...@gmx.net,
On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 12.11.2013 17:48 schrieb Markus Lanthaler:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:04 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
We could define some ways to list set of images
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com
(mailto:w...@adambarth.com) wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background-image:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:38 AM, li...@ericportis.com
li...@ericportis.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com
(mailto:w...@adambarth.com) wrote:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width:
Am 12.11.2013 18:50 schrieb Adam Barth:
We might even be able to make this work without inventing anything:
style type=text/css
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected {
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background-image: image-set(url(small.png) 1x, url(small-hires.png) 2x);
}
}
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
Then I object to us shipping this in Chrome. Bleeding on the global
scope with such a generic name ignoring all the other reasonable uses of
the word Path is not good for the platform. It's not forward thinking,
and it's confusing for developers.
The hard part is deciding what to put in the optimized subset. We
already parse media queries in the preload scanner to find imported
stylesheets to load. We probably won't be able to support every media
query under the sun, but we could support maybe min-width, min-height,
and
On 11/12/13 12:11 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi
wrote:
2013-11-12 9:58, Adam Barth wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't add new tags to head. If the parser sees a
tag it doesn't recognize in the head, it creates a
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
What I don't like about CSS approaches is the fact that changing the source
of an image is fundamentally different from changing a dimension or color of
an element. This is not presentational in the same way. Having to
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Christian Biesinger
cbiesin...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
What I don't like about CSS approaches is the fact that changing the source
of an image is fundamentally different from changing a dimension or
On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Christian Biesinger
cbiesin...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
What I don't like about CSS approaches is the fact that changing
On 13.11.2013 2:56, Christian Biesinger wrote:
For a bit more presentation, and while we're inventing new syntax
anyway, how about this:
style
@media (min-width: 480px) {
.artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-small)); }
...
/style
...
img class=artdirected src=foo.jpg
[resending because of a bounced message]
DrawingPath is saying the same thing twice.
Maybe DOMDrawing is better? (with drawing the definition of
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/drawing?q=drawing)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
37 matches
Mail list logo
