Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

2016-10-05 Thread Jacob Villarreal
Hi,Thanks for responding.  I don't think you have the right picture as to what I was proposing.  I'll try to clear it up a bit.  I was actually proposing a new markup language referred to as content markup language.  The hypertext part of it isn't that important.  CML would has the linking

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

2016-10-05 Thread Roger Hågensen
On 2016-10-05 08:17, Jacob Villarreal wrote: > I was proposing a really simple markup language. I call it content markup language (CML). You do realize that HTML stands for Hyper Text Markup Language right? Adding a markup language to a markup language is illogical, it is better to improve

[whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

2016-10-05 Thread Jacob Villarreal
I was proposing a really simple markup language.  I call it content markup language (CML).  It implements a simple object-oriented content markup infrastructure which treats every page element as an object.  It consists of a simple batch html infrastructure with only four batch file types for