Re: [whatwg] WebSockets: UDP

2010-06-02 Thread Ben Garney
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Erik Möller emol...@opera.com wrote: No it can't be UDP, it'll have to be something layered on top of UDP. One of the game guys I spoke to last night said Honestly, I wish we just had real sockets. It always seems like web coding comes down to reinventing a

Re: [whatwg] WebSockets: UDP

2010-06-02 Thread Ben Garney
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Philip Taylor excors+wha...@gmail.comexcors%2bwha...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to think of them mainly as indirect examples of use cases, rather than as direct examples of interfaces. Under the assumption This is a very valid approach. (Note that most

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSockets: UDP

2010-06-01 Thread Ben Garney
this is the common case, since we are not trying to run service hosts in the browser at this time. If you have any sort of connection identifier (typically port will be different even if IP is not), then you can multiplex by that. (Also, hi! This is my first post. I'm Ben Garney, I worked at PushButton Labs