But wouldn't we create a situation where the main content tag is misused
and essentially then we'd recreate the situation with body?
IMHO you can't stop tags from being misused, and that goes for any tag.
What I am taking about is that it is upside down to expect honest people to
define
I am the one posting the question on the help list. To me, the lack of html5
definition of main content, ie body copy in paper publishing, is a big
mistake. Imagine the amount of sites where everything else includes a lot
of unimportant extra, or peripheral, content. Content which is not
-04 at 16:27 +0200, Daniel Persson wrote:
I am the one posting the question on the help list. To me, the lack of
html5 definition of main content, ie body copy in paper publishing, is a big
mistake. Imagine the amount of sites where everything else includes a lot
of unimportant extra
compliance, should
have an easy escape of at least defining the most important on the site.
Thanks
/Daniel
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:05 +0200, Daniel Persson wrote:
If i view the html-web as it is now, inside body
for + anything a
lazy/stressed/unconscious author didn't tag otherwise. Let's just have a
main content tag or a strong main content strategy.
Thanks
/Daniel
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 18:03 +0200, Daniel Persson wrote:
Some
