2009/6/19 Kristof Zelechovski giecr...@stegny.2a.pl:
You can easily include a cross-domain script using a cross-domain DTD; just
attach the malware as
!ATTLIST body onload CDATA “{ sniper.shoot(); }”
and hope for the worst.
Chris
You need to own the external subset, though, in order to
2009/6/10 Dahal, Biswa biswa-da...@uiowa.edu:
Hi,
I am a developer and as I was going through the draft for HTML 5 at:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author/#tabular-data, I could not find a common
use-case that should be supported.
That is not the HTML5 draft, that is the HTML5 for Authors
2009/6/10 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Brett Zamir wrote:
In order to comply with XML ID requirements in XML, and facilitate
future transitions to XML, can HTML 5 explicitly encourage id attribute
values to follow this pattern (e.g., disallowing numbers for the
starting
Please don't cross-post to w3 lists and to whatwg lists.
2009/6/8 Asser Nilsson asser.nils...@googlemail.com:
Hi!
There are two things in HTML5-forms that are often made with Active
Technology like JavaScript, that would be very cool, if HTML5 could do
these things without Scripting:
1.
2009/6/5 Jeff Walden jwalden+wha...@mit.edu:
Do you seriously believe any client in an industry where he has to step
carefully enough to worry about typographical formatting of legal notices is
fool enough to follow a not-even-recommendation in the HTML5 specification
over what his lawyer
2009/5/5 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
What is embed used for? Flash and videos. Both have intrinsic sizes
What is object used for? Videos, Java applets and Silverlight. They
all have intrinsic sizes
2009/5/5 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
svg has an intrinsic size (like video,img, and
embed/object), the other have not.
video and img usually have intrinsic sizes, but
embed/object/iframe usually
2009/5/4 Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com:
On May 4, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:15:04 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
As far as I can tell this doesn't require any changes to HTML5, since the
same applies here as applies to a regular img, right?
2009/4/24 Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.com:
Almost all JavaScript libraries and web apps of moderate size end up
reimplementing events for their UI toolkits or for messaging between
different parts of their application. To help out with this scenario
it would be good if an
2009/4/24 Alex Russell slightly...@google.com:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/24 Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.com:
Almost all JavaScript libraries and web apps of moderate size end up
reimplementing events for their UI
2009/4/6 Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Ojan Vafai:
2) Add a css or xpath expression to fragment identifiers. Tthe iframe
src can be set to http://foo.com#css(.foo #bar). Same as above
applies. If there's no match,
A few comments, as requested by Ian Hickson.
- End of 2.2.1, a typo: JavsScript instead of Javascript
- From section 2.4.2 I don't understand if boolean attributes with
invalid values represent true or false. In addition, I don't
understand if an empty value is false (as in XHTML1.0) or true (as
2009/3/29 Kristof Zelechovski giecr...@stegny.2a.pl:
It is not clear that the server will be able to correctly support various
representations of characters in the path component, e.g. identify accented
characters with their decompositions using combining diacritical marks. The
peculiarities
(In this email I will use URL5 as a short for Web Addresses, as that
previously was the URL part of HTML5)
As subject says, this is the continuation of the thread about LEIRI vs
URL5 archived at
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-March/018929.html,
where discussion diverged
2009/3/29 Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:37:19 +0200, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Summing up, the differences between URL5 and LEIRI are only about the
percent sign and its uses for delimiters.
I'm not sure if you're correct about those
2009/3/29 Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:01:51 +0200, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/29 Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
I'm not sure if you're correct about those differences, but even if you
are they are not the only differences
2009/3/22 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Now I would like to ask:
are there any major differences that requires the W3C / WHATWG to
publish an other specification, just for HTML5, instead of just
referencing the IRI-bis draft or the LEIRI working
HTML5 originally included a section about resource identifiers
processing. A few days ago that section was extracted into the W3C
editor draft of Web Addresses. I noticed it and remembered that I had
read once something like that.
Precisely, what I once read is http://www.w3.org/TR/leiri, a note
2009/3/9 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/9 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Giovanni Campagna
This can be even worse: how would you syncronize the code in the
callback
2009/2/11 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
[...]
2) you depend on css3-ui, in CR stage, instead of becss, a very
early WD
BECSS is actually probably more stable than CSS3 UI at this point.
Why do you say so? Will CSS3 UI go back to Last Call or BECSS process to
Last Call in the
@Smylers:
So the whole rendering section is just for implementors and authors should
act if no default style sheet is present or worse, if it could be
everything, like a inline-block div or blue table, so that the author
should set all supported properties to initial or the HTML5 expected
value?
2009/2/9 Smylers smyl...@stripey.com
Giovanni Campagna writes:
So the whole rendering section is just for implementors and authors
should act if no default style sheet is present
No; the section is also for authors, in that it advises them of how
content is expected to be rendered
2009/2/8 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com
On 7/2/09 20:07, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Yes, but what properties should I query for?
In order to find out what, precisely?
What to reset, for example (see the first Ian email on this topic)
Binding, behaviour, appearance
2009/2/8 Smylers smyl...@stripey.com
Giovanni Campagna writes:
If input type=submit in some UA is rendered with all properties
set to initial, not only it does not express the semantic of a button,
but it may be difficult for a user to actually recognize it as a
button and eventually
2009/2/6 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
I'm proposing to replace the current rendering mechanism, based on
Behavioural Extension to CSS, that in turn is based on XBL2, with
something based on the CSS3 Basic User Interface (css3-ui), ie replacing
2009/2/7 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com
On 7/2/09 14:22, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
5) becss requires one or more binding languages: it is not
necessarily
XBL2, but currently XBL2 is the only one available: are you
constraining
the implementation
2009/2/7 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com
On 7/2/09 18:51, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
So the rendering section imposes *no* requirements on HTML5
conforming user agents, therefore the spec is not constraining the
implementation of HTML5 on that of XBL2.
Yes, but UA
I'm proposing to replace the current rendering mechanism, based on
Behavioural Extension to CSS, that in turn is based on XBL2, with something
based on the CSS3 Basic User Interface (css3-ui), ie replacing the binding:
property with appropriate appearance: property directly on the element,
instead
a elements are always hyperlinks, link can be hyperlinks or
resources. So it only makes sense for the link element to be
explicitly marked like this.
Giovanni
2009/2/3 Philipp Kempgen philipp.kemp...@amooma.de:
---cut---
5.12.3.7 Link type help
The help keyword may be used with link, a, and
I've tried to follow all the discussion besides of its lengths and my
conclusion is:
You're asking the wrong question
People against RDFa in HTML5 are asking why do you need RDFa?, and
supporters of the proposal are actually describing the benefits of RDFa
itself.
The right question is: why do
2008/12/30 timeless timel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net
wrote:
It's useful for fields that contain non-textual content, e.g. product ID,
license plate number, CAPTCHA answer, etc.
Browser would mark these as misspelt, which might be
Very back in 2002, a W3C Note about the integration of XHTML (at that time
was 1.1, now it would be 2.0) and SMIL (at that time 2.0, now 3.0). I was
wondering if any work was produced because of that document, or it was
simply forgotten.
IMHO, it addresses many issues:
1) the video HTML5 element
Probably you didn't notice, but it is 25th December today. Merry Christmas
and Happy New Year to all members of WHAT and W3C working groups!
Giovanni
2008/12/25 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
We're very constrained by the legacy for text/html's syntax; sadly,
usability concerns aren't really able to make us change the language.
[...]
The goal is not to guess what the author meant when the authors makes a
mistake; the goal is to have
2008/12/21 Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
Styling is done in css.
Dynamic styling is currently done with the style property of HTMLElement.
This is currently implemented in DOM2HTML and HTML5, but I once read they're
going to write a separate CSS-Object Model, whose spec is not ready
inside
HTML.
Best regards,
Giovanni Campagna
2008/12/17 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
This doesn't cost any time in HTML either, since the tokeniser doesn't
need to worry about what tags have end tags, the tree construction side
just drops unexpected end tags on the floor.
I don't think authors expect tags to disappear.
don't check for
-formed XHTML
6) use JS + DOM
Do you think it is enough?
Giovanni Campagna
(DOMDocument.write or
DOMElement.outerHTML) should be marked deprecate, since there are stricter
and more performant way to do same thing.
Giovanni Campagna
the string HTML is
deprecated and should no longer be used?
By the way, XHTML1.0 / 1.1 said nothing about HTML4, they were independent
specifications.
Giovanni Campagna
2008/12/16 Nils Dagsson Moskopp
nils-dagsson-mosk...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net
Am Dienstag, den 16.12.2008, 14:32 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
(The same behaviour can be achieved also with a @namespace rule,
putting non-standard attributes in an application-specific namespace)
Since
2008/12/16 Nils Dagsson Moskopp
nils-dagsson-mosk...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net
Am Dienstag, den 16.12.2008, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
Browser assume that author knows XML because he's put an application/*
+xml mime type.
On the other hand, this assumption cannot be done
2008/12/16 Nils Dagsson Moskopp
nils-dagsson-mosk...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net
Am Dienstag, den 16.12.2008, 14:14 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
Maybe so-called invalid HTML attributes are not the only solution,
but in my opinion it is a simple way to embed metadata within any
element
Maybe so-called invalid HTML attributes are not the only solution, but in
my opinion it is a simple way to embed metadata within any element.
Imagine that such markup is then passed to a web application through XHR. In
that case scripts aren't parsed and executed. In this case you have three
ways
44 matches
Mail list logo
