Re: [whatwg] WHATWG Status Updater

to the mailing list members (non-publicly). It's coming faster and faster, now, so I'd recommend doing it as soon as possible. (Who's in charge of updating the site, anyway? LOL +1 Latest status is I LOVE THE C*CK!!! Funniest thing I've seen in ages -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Microdata and Linked Data

with xmlns, is just a minor design flaw, xmlns is used for structure not content and they realize that issue. Best wishes -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

[whatwg] video audio support?

Hello, Quick question, Is there a list of browsers that support the video and audio tags ? Thanks -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello Martin McEvoy wrote: @rev = This relates to That, or a rev=help link indicates that the current document is help for the resource indicated by the href. @rel = That relates to This, or a rel=help link indicates that the resource indicated by the href is help for the current document

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello Ian, Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Martin McEvoy wrote: The second most common value was rev=stylesheet, which is meaningless and obviously meant to be rel=stylesheet. And that was the basis of the whatwg decision to drop rev? Yes. Was this the study you

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello Philip Philip Taylor wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/linkrels.html [...] If you have a more up to date study on link relationships, please can I have a link? http://philip.html5.org

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Smylers wrote: Martin McEvoy writes: Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Martin McEvoy wrote: (I am not criticizing just trying to understand it) surely all it needed was to define some rev values (the same as rel) and people will start using rev correctly

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

important link relationship for an author, HTML5 really shouldn't abandon rev because of it. Thanks -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

) but I cant imagine the figure will get any where near 57%? Thanks -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Philip Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philip Taylor wrote: rev=stylesheet makes up 57

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Martin McEvoy wrote: It basically says that the whole premise that HTML5 should drop *rev* (a) because authors use it wrong, (b) Many authors use rev-stylesheet wrong, is a MYTH and an inaccurate assessment of the *rev* attribute As others

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Martin McEvoy wrote: rel=author on the whole only relates to published documents, rel=made---oops! rev=made relates to Documents, Music, Photos, Videos, Sunday Lunch! Literaly anything that can be *made* But you knew that ;-) -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

is there to be made, Its all just wasted time (something I don't have right now), Im sure HTML5 will be great for Browser Vendors, for the Humble author well we'll see. Thanks everyone for your...er...kind words see ya ;-) -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

[whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello all Just one small question Why Has HTML5 dropped the rev=[1] attribute? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/#absent-attributes Thanks -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello Ian Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Martin McEvoy wrote: Just one small question Why Has HTML5 dropped the rev=[1] attribute? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/#absent-attributes We did some studies and found that the attribute was almost never used, and most

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Hello... Smylers wrote: Martin McEvoy writes: o be precise, the most commonly used value was rev=made, which is equivalent to rel=author and thus was not a convincing use case. !! rel-author doesn't mean the same as rev-made eg: In which cases doesn't

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Lachlan Hunt wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: From the real world found here: http://nfegen.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/micrordformats/ pI read an interesting post recently, a href=http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2008/03/so-how-about-using-rdfa-in-microformats.html; title=Link to Mark Birbeck

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

Robert O'Rourke wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: From the real world found here: http://nfegen.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/micrordformats/ a rev=reply href=http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2008/03/so-how-about-using-rdfa-in-microformats.html; title=Link

Re: [whatwg] ---

Sam Kuper wrote: 2008/11/5 Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] closely followed by the Mosaic Web Browser[1] a direct descendant of Firefox Ancestor, surely? LOL yes -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/

Re: [whatwg] ---

timeless wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Berners-Lee apparently when he introduced a bunch of technologies such as HTTP, HTML FTP, IP TCIP and others and called it the World Wide Web, closely followed by the Mosaic Web Browser[1] a direct

Re: [whatwg] ---

of Firefox ;-) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(web_browser)] -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/