Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-08-21 Thread Steve Dennis
While it's unlikely that screen resolution will go above 2x in the near future, should we be taking into account the zooming of specific elements that might result in the need for larger artwork? (take icons, that can scale all the way up to 512px or above) On 13/08/2012, at 5:39 PM, Henri

Re: [whatwg] 'Main Part of the Content' Idiom

2010-06-04 Thread Steve Dennis
The purpose of all the new tags, is so the machine can figure out what is NOT main content, and assume everything else is. With proper use of sectioning and aside as well as header and footers this can be mostly achieved today. On 4/06/2010, at 5:39 PM, Daniel Persson wrote: I am not

Re: [whatwg] RFC: input type=username

2010-05-05 Thread Steve Dennis
isn't really an option. Someone tell me if I'm wrong on that though, I'm just a designer :) -- Steve Dennis www.subcide.com

Re: [whatwg] RFC: input type=username

2010-05-04 Thread Steve Dennis
. Saying why bother? about all the broken sites on the web totally defeats the purpose of what everyone here's trying to achieve. -- Steve Dennis www.subcide.com

Re: [whatwg] img as a layout tool to describe the displayed region of a CSS background-image

2010-04-28 Thread Steve Dennis
lots of us will look back on sprites the same way we see spacer.gifs, which were a necessary evil at the time. - Steve Dennis Yes, this is using the img as a layout tool. Specifically, you're using the img to avoid specifying width and height in CSS, and to enable further layout hacks