On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Justin Lebarjustin.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
But more to the point, I think globalScript is a good replacement for
the pushState additions to the History spec.
I'm not sure I agree. pushState lets you change the URI very quickly,
without
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that pushState obviates the need for
global script. My point is that pushState is useful in its own right,
with our without global script.
Without pushstate, you can't make a non-hash navigation without
hitting the network. Even if you're clever and store all of
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Justin Lebarjustin.le...@gmail.com wrote:
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that pushState obviates the need for
global script. My point is that pushState is useful in its own right,
with our without global script.
Without pushstate, you can't make a non-hash
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
But more to the point, I think globalScript is a good replacement for
the pushState additions to the History spec.
I'm not sure I agree. pushState lets you change the URI very quickly,
without doing any kind of navigation at all. To emulate a pushSate
with
PushState is also useful for e.g. making sure that the referer header
contains useful information. Not to say that there aren't other ways to
accomplish that, but it is one thing that Global Context won't give you.
2009/9/7 Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.com
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
But more
