The device was added by Ian Hickson in response to some of the work in the
W3C DAP working group. The original intent was to make sure the user are
actively grant permission to a particular device camera or microphone instead
of just click okay since some malicious site can just capture and
Hi,
I've been reading lately about the new proposed device element, and
was wondering if it was needed at all.
IMHO, a video originating from an attached camera is not different
from a video originating from the network, so video could be used
here.
Displaying the webcam in a page could be done
On Tue, 04 May 2010 11:01:14 +0900, Julien Cayzac
julien.cay...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading lately about the new proposed device element, and
was wondering if it was needed at all.
IMHO, a video originating from an attached camera is not different
from a video originating from the
(forgot to do a Reply to all on this one. Sorry, Anne, for the duplicate)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
What is the model for protecting user privacy here?
It was in my message: in both cases the browser should notify the
user the page is requesting
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Julien Cayzac julien.cay...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure if I get your point here: are you saying that using the
webcam locally in a canvas and somehow transmitting the webcam video
over the network are two independent permissions to grant? If so, how
would
