On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
For example, see Google Gadgets
http://www.google.com/webmasters/gadgets/, or iframe sandboxes used
for isolating untrusted content while still being inline in the page.
Yes, if we add doc= support to iframe maybe that would make this
case
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Brian Campbell wrote:
On Jun 4, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
A title is usually a good idea, but is it really necessary to
require this for conformance? After all, a title is not something
which an
On Jun 4, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
A title is usually a good idea, but is it really necessary to
require
this for conformance? After all, a title is not something which an
author is likely to forget, and leaving it out has no
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
HTML can be used as an advanced text format, and people may want to
convert existing plain text to HTML. For example's sake, consider the
following:
A Short Document
This is a short plain-text document which someone
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Michael Enright wrote:
If you use HTML as a text file format you can still let the receiving
parser infer all sorts of tags and allow yourself to write things like
Andersen's first HTML version. If you want a title, put a title element
in. Is the concern about
On 18 Apr 2009, at 00:02, Randy Drielinger wrote:
If you're converting from a textfile, title could refer to the
filename.
It could, but chances are that the original filename would typically
be less useful than the URL, which is what most browsers use when the
title element is omitted,
Øistein E. Andersen schrieb:
On 18 Apr 2009, at 00:02, Randy Drielinger wrote:
If you're converting from a textfile, title could refer to the filename.
It could, but chances are that the original filename would typically be
less useful than the URL, which is what most browsers use when the
The DOCTYPE is required and it should be. That way, the text introduces
itself and instructs the reader about the expected renderer (in absence of
external metadata).
I have seen several products (mail readers and proxies, on-line help
systems, fora etc.) trying to interpret every text as HTML,
HTML can be used as an advanced text format, and people may want to
convert existing plain text to HTML. For example's sake, consider the
following:
A Short Document
This is a short plain-text document which someone
might want to convert into HTML.
As faithful readers of
.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Øistein E. Andersen li...@coq.no
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2009 21:49
Aan: wha...@whatwg.org
Onderwerp: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should title be optional?
HTML can be used as an advanced text format, and people may want to
convert existing plain text to HTML
.
Personally I don't see any reason to make title optional.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Øistein E. Andersen li...@coq.no
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2009 21:49
Aan: wha...@whatwg.org
Onderwerp: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should title be optional?
HTML can be used as an advanced
11 matches
Mail list logo
