Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Manu Sporny wrote:
Creating a Microformat is a very time consuming prospect, including:
... Microformats Due Diligence Rules ...
Are you saying that RDF vocabularies can be created _without_ this due
diligence?
What I am saying is that the amount of
Ian Hickson wrote:
One organization for *all* topics, ever?
I don't think that would really scale. Even for major languages, like
HTML, we haven't found a single organisation to be a successful model.
Then you, Ben, and I agree on this particular point:
In order for semantic/micro-data
bcc: Public RDFa Task Force mailing list (but not speaking as a member)
Kyle Weems recent post[1] on CSSquirrel discusses[2] some of the more
recent rumblings surrounding RDFa and Microformats as potential
micro-data solutions. It specifically addresses a conversation between
Ian and Tantek
Ian Hickson wrote:
Are you saying that RDF vocabularies can be created _without_ this due
diligence?
Who decides what the right due diligence is? One organization for *all*
topics, ever?
An RDF vocabulary can be created by the proper community, i.e. a music
vocabulary by music experts, a
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Ben Adida wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Are you saying that RDF vocabularies can be created _without_ this due
diligence?
Who decides what the right due diligence is?
The person writing the vocabulary, presumably.
One organization for *all* topics, ever?
I don't think
