Re: [whatwg] [ogg-dev] HTML5 audio tag

2010-05-11 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Yeah, the track attribute of the media fragments specification that Ralph links will in theory allow to just download the track-related data. But it still requires implementation - either in the browser, which will somehow need to identify which bytes belong to which track and just request those

Re: [whatwg] [ogg-dev] HTML5 audio tag

2010-05-11 Thread Chris Pearce
In order to do this you'd need to know /in advance/ exactly which Ogg pages were audio and which were video so you could choose to only download the vorbis pages. The upcoming Ogg Skeleton index does not index pages at a high enough granularity to facilitate this. It could, but then the index

Re: [whatwg] [ogg-dev] HTML5 audio tag

2010-05-11 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
I've heard it is easier with MP4 to do byte-range requests for a track only. Thanks for clarifying that index won't have any of this information! Indeed, providing an audio file on the server is the simplest solution to this (follow the KISS-principle :). Cheers, Silvia. On Wed, May 12, 2010 at

Re: [whatwg] OGG in HTML5

2007-12-11 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
On 11 Dec 2007, at 16:20, alex wrote: I am a webdeveloper and a fierce supporter of opensource. I was under the impression the standards were being designed in the same opensource spirit, but I may have been wrong. Standards are developed inline with the policies of the organisations

Re: [whatwg] OGG in HTML5

2007-12-11 Thread SA Alfonso Baqueiro
2007/12/11, alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am a webdeveloper and a fierce supporter of opensource. I was under the impression the standards were being designed in the same opensource spirit, but I may have been wrong. Setting OGG as the de facto standard is the best idea i've heard in a long time,