From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Geoffrey Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Pentasis [EMAIL PROTECTED]; whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Question regarding accessibility for img
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:40
I notice that it says in the spec under the img-section:
There has been some suggestion that the longdesc attribute from HTML4, or
some other mechanism that is more powerful than alt=, should be included.
This has not yet been considered.
May I ask why it has not been considered (yet)?
Bert
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:40, Pentasis wrote:
I notice that it says in the spec under the img-section:
There has been some suggestion that the longdesc attribute from
HTML4, or some other mechanism that is more powerful than alt=,
should be included. This has not yet been considered.
May I
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:40, Pentasis wrote:
I notice that it says in the spec under the img-section:
There has been some suggestion that the longdesc attribute from
HTML4, or some other mechanism that is more powerful than alt=,
should be included. This has not yet
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Pentasis wrote:
I notice that it says in the spec under the img-section:
There has been some suggestion that the longdesc attribute from HTML4,
or some other mechanism that is more powerful than alt=, should be
included. This has not yet been considered.
May I ask
