property=foaf:name
Mac/span .
Ugh. That really hurt.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manu Sporny
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:10 AM
To: WHAT-WG
Subject: [whatwg] RDFa Basics Video (8 minutes)
Here's a quick 8 minute RDFa
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
seems to be too vulnerable and error-prone
You're basing this on your impression. The demos that we've been working
on, and the ability with which folks are able to mark up their pages
using FOAF, shows that this isn't all that error-prone at all.
You clearly have a
.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ben Adida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:28 PM
To: Kristof Zelechovski
Cc: 'Manu Sporny'; 'WHAT-WG'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa Basics Video (8 minutes)
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
seems to be too vulnerable and error-prone
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
We have two options for having both human-readable and machine-readable
information in a document: write the structure and generate the text or
write the text and recover the structure. At the very least, if you insist
on having both, there must be a mechanism to
To: Kristof Zelechovski
Cc: 'WHAT-WG'; 'Manu Sporny'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa Basics Video (8 minutes)
Consider:
h2 property=dc:creatorKristof/h2
The creator string Kristof is written only once, and plays both roles.
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
Your markup means Kristof is the creator
of the current page, by default.
but the text displayed is just
Kristof. It is incomplete; the human reader will not know what it means.
Sorry, I should have written:
by h2 property=dc:creatorKristof/h2
-Ben
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
[...] However, having
semantic networks and plain text as interleaved alternative streams
of the
same content, which is what the demonstration shows, seems to be too
vulnerable and error-prone, especially when there is no validator
at hand
that could verify that
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Toby A Inkster
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:15 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa Basics Video (8 minutes)
I'm not surprised it hurt - that's an overly verbose way of
expressing that data.
p
On 27 Aug 2008, at 17:43, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
Well, that sounds better. What makes me uneasy is that objects are
indeed
taken from the text but predicates are in the attribute values and
therefore
they must be duplicated to make a sentence.
Well, this works the same way
Here's a quick 8 minute RDFa Basics video for those of you that are not
familiar with how RDF and RDFa work. I'm posting this in an attempt to
bring those that are unfamiliar with these concepts up to speed.
RDFa Basics (8 minutes)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldl0m-5zLz4
-- manu
--
Manu
10 matches
Mail list logo
