On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Pentasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have a few problems here, but nothing I cannot handle. For some
reason I get my e-mails later than I should and they are working on the
electricity grid here, so I have no power during the day (only at night).
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
Can somebody put forward any technical argument against this idea?
For my benefit, could you succintly summarise the changes that this would
involve to the spec? (Not the exact wording, but a basic overview of what
you see being added or changed.)
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
Can somebody put forward any technical argument against this idea?
For my benefit, could you succintly summarise the changes that this would
involve to the spec? I'm not sure I
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Philipp Serafin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Leons Petrazickis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It matters in the sense that web browsers would have to implement both
approaches for backwards compatibility.
This depends what you mean when
Pentasis schrieb:
This I understand, and I can even sympathise with it. However, I do hope
that at least they will take this issue seriously and at least try to
build in something that will enable us to work on that part of the spec
independantly later on. I still think that the semantic
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Pentasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure whether I understand you correctly... Of course the
practical use of a specification lies in its technical implementations, or
do you disagree with that? You are free to specify your own markup language,
but it
This would only work in new browsers and is wordy:
reference class=abbreviation ttle=some
descriptionsomeword/reference.
It doesn't add any extra information. It's harder to use.
Conceptually, it may be more elegant, but conceptual elegance is not
an impetus for large scale adoptions. In my
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Leons Petrazickis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It matters in the sense that web browsers would have to implement both
approaches for backwards compatibility.
This depends what you mean when talking about implementing a tag.
Browsers already load all tags and
