Karl Dubost wrote:
Sam,
Le 6 déc. 2006 à 23:13, Sam Ruby a écrit :
My original interest was to write a replacement for Python's SGMLLIB,
i.e., one that was not based on the theoretical ideal of how SGML
vocabularies work, but one based on the practical notion of how HTML
actually is parsed.
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, James Graham wrote:
As someone in the process of implementing a HTML5 parser from the spec,
my _only_ complaint so far is that there aren't (yet) any testcases.
If you could get together with the other people writing parsers and come
up with a standard
James Graham wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, James Graham wrote:
As someone in the process of implementing a HTML5 parser from the
spec, my _only_ complaint so far is that there aren't (yet) any
testcases.
If you could get together with the other people writing parsers and
Sam Ruby wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/
I have no interest in participating in a project without test cases.
You are entirely right that we have a serious lack of testcases at the moment.
This is intended to be a temporary situation, hence my interest
Le 6 déc. 2006 à 21:33, James Graham a écrit :
Did you have a list for implementers somewhere? I think it would be
a very worthwhile effort to come up with a set of implementation
independent, self-describing (i.e. where the testcase itself
contains the expected parse tree in some form),
Sam,
Le 6 déc. 2006 à 23:13, Sam Ruby a écrit :
My original interest was to write a replacement for Python's
SGMLLIB, i.e., one that was not based on the theoretical ideal of
how SGML vocabularies work, but one based on the practical notion
of how HTML actually is parsed.
I'm not sure
