On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The section on handling entities should contain the following mapping:
[...]
... mostly for legacy reasons.
Let me know if the table in that section is what you wanted.
Cheers,
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Sam Ruby wrote:
+1, though I would suggest a one change:
159: 376 // Yuml;
The spec does indeed say this.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things
The section on handling entities should contain the following mapping:
128: 8364,
129: 65533,
130: 8218,
131: 402,
132: 8222,
133: 8230,
134: 8224,
135: 8225,
136: 710,
137: 8240,
138: 352,
139: 8249,
140: 338,
141: 65533,
142: 381,
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The section on handling entities should contain the following mapping:
128: 8364,
129: 65533,
130: 8218,
131: 402,
132: 8222,
133: 8230,
134: 8224,
135: 8225,
136: 710,
137: 8240,
138: 352,
139: 8249,
140: 338,
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:51:55 +0100, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1, though I would suggest a one change:
159: 376 // Yuml;
Yeah. That was actually a mistake on my side.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
